Box 1 Some of the differences between routine clinical practice and traditional randomised controlled trial (RCT) design
Events in a typical RCT Events in the real world

Patients are recruited from specialist centres, or by advertising Patients are mainly treated in primary care
Patients with comorbid medical or psychiatric disorders are excluded Patients are probably treated whatever comorbid disorders are present
Patients are carefully selected to generate homogeneous diagnostic groups according to DSM and ICD Patients with heterogeneous diagnoses according to DSM or ICD are ‘lumped’ together
Patients are allocated the treatment at random Treatment is allocated via a complex process of explanation and negotiation
Patients are given detailed information (which may be overinclusive) for informed consent Patients provided brief information (which may be underinclusive) for informed consent
Patients are given a 1-week placebo run-in period to remove placebo responders All patients are given active treatment from the start
Placebo is used to compare active treatment No placebo is used: choice is between active treatment and no treatment
Patients are followed at frequent intervals and given detailed checklists of side-effects Patients are followed at very varying intervals according to haphazard practice
Assessment end-point is typically 4–6 weeks after treatment begins Patients continue on treatment for 6 months, and patient and clinician are interested in much longer end-points
Assessment of outcome is based on depressive symptoms and side-effects To patient and doctor, functional outcomes (e.g. return to work) may be more important
Patient and clinician are blind to treatment group Both (usually) are aware of the drug the patient is given