The emphasis on the evidence base of treatments may diminish awareness that critical appraisal of research into other aspects of psychiatric practice is equally important. There is a risk that diagnostic tests may be inappropriate in some clinical settings or the results of a particular test may be over-interpreted, leading to incorrect diagnosis. This article outlines the method of critically evaluating the validity of articles about diagnostic and screening tests in psychiatry and discusses concepts of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. The use of likelihood ratios in improving clinical certainty that a disease is present or absent is examined.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. S. John-Smith, A. Michael, and T. Davies Coping with a coroner's inquest: a psychiatrist's guide Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2009; 15(1): 7 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Harrison-Read IQ tests as aids to diagnosis and management in early schizophrenia Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2008; 14(3): 235 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wiederkehr, M. Simard, C. Fortin, and R. van Reekum Validity of the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Vascular Dementia: A Critical Review. Part II J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, May 1, 2008; 20(2): 162 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ercan, A. Kevern, and L. Kroll Evaluation of a mental health website for teenagers Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2006; 30(5): 175 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||