This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayney, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bayney, R.
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2005) 11: 305-314
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Benchmarking in mental health: an introduction for psychiatrists

Richard Bayney

Richard Bayney is a consultant psychiatrist at the Directorate of Forensic Psychiatry, West London Mental Health Care NHS Trust (Uxbridge Road, Southall, Middlesex UB1 3EU, UK. Tel: 020 8354 8680; e-mail: Richard.Bayneyric{at}wlmht.nhs.uk). His clinical and research interests include the organisation and effectiveness of mental health services in the National Health Service.

Benchmarking has been advocated by the Department of Health as a tool of clinical governance. The essence of benchmarking is learning from the best practice of others. Its ability to compare services and outcomes of care can facilitate change, ensuring quality control and continuous service improvement. The concept is in its infancy in the National Health Service despite its exceptionally rapid growth in business organisations over the past 25 years. Many of the characteristics that make the process so valuable in business are equally relevant in healthcare. This article reviews the history of benchmarking and describes its application in mental health services for improving patient care. It includes an analysis of the centrality of the benchmarking doctrine to the core principles of clinical governance and reflects on the assets health services possess to facilitate benchmarking. It concentrates on the principles of setting up a team and uses a case example to highlight the organisational and clinical effect that a benchmarking project could have.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
N. O'Keeffe, U. S. Ramaiah, E. Nomani, M. Fitzpatrick, and G. Ranjith
Benchmarking a liaison psychiatry service: a prospective 6-month study of quality indicators
Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2007; 31(9): 345 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
P. Sugarman
Governance, strategy and innovation in mental health
Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2007; 31(8): 283 - 285.
[Full Text] [PDF]