APT Evidence-Based Mental Health
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mace, C.
Right arrow Articles by Binyon, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mace, C.
Right arrow Articles by Binyon, S.
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2005) 11: 416-423
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Teaching psychodynamic formulation to psychiatric trainees

Part 1: Basics of formulation

Chris Mace and Sharon Binyon

Chris Mace is consultant psychotherapist and Director of Medical Education at South Warwickshire Primary Care Trust (The Pines, St Michael’s Hospital, Warwick CV34 5QW, UK. E-mail: C.Mace{at}Warwick.ac.uk) and honorary senior lecturer in psychotherapy at the University of Warwick. He is a training programme director in psychotherapy and has a research interest in assessment for psychotherapy. Since this article was written, he has joined the UK OPD task force. Sharon Binyon is a consultant in adult psychiatry with a special interest in psychotherapy, and Associate Medical Director to North Warwickshire Primary Care Trust. She is clinical tutor and scheme organiser for the Coventry & Warwickshire SHO training scheme.

All psychiatrists should be able to construct a psychodynamic formulation of a case. A key advantage of formulation over diagnosis is that it can be used to predict how an individual might respond in certain situations and to various psychotherapies. This article looks in some depth at what psychiatric trainees need to be taught about psychodynamic formulation. We introduce formulation in terms of four levels, each level corresponding to a different degree of theoretical and clinical sophistication and therefore to different trainees’ needs. We use a case vignette to illustrate how a clinical situation might be formulated at each of these levels.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
D. Freeman and P. Garety
Helping patients with paranoid and suspicious thoughts: a cognitive-behavioural approach
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2006; 12(6): 404 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
R. Lucas
Over-formalising the formulation?: INVITED COMMENTARY ON: TEACHING PSYCHODYNAMIC FORMULATION TO PSYCHIATRIC TRAINEES
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., July 1, 2006; 12(4): 265 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
C. Mace and S. Binyon
Teaching psychodynamic formulation to psychiatric trainees. Part 2: Teaching methods
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., March 1, 2006; 12(2): 92 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.