APT E-mail content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davenport, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davenport, S.
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2006) 12: 45-53
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Ensuring the community cares: assessment and evaluation of social care needs in long-term mental illness

Sarah Davenport

Sarah Davenport is a consultant psychiatrist in rehabilitation, working in a women’s secure service in Preston (Guild Lodge, Guild Park, Whittingham, Preston PR3 2AZ, UK. E-mail: SarahDvnpt{at}aol.com). She was the first Chair of the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ new Faculty of Rehabilitation and Social Psychiatry and has coedited and authored chapters for Enabling Recovery: The Principles and Practice of Rehabilitation Psychiatry (eds G. Roberts, S. Davenport, F. Holloway, et al), due to be published by Gaskell in 2006.

Clinicians have been divided in their views on whether systematic needs assessment leads to an improvement in the outcome of care for people with chronic mental illness. Policy makers assume that assessment and evaluation will improve the clinical and cost-effectiveness of mental health services. Many of these assumptions are already embedded within mental health policy and practice. A decade of research has not resolved this tension. However, clinicians need to know about the options available to guide systematic assessment and evaluation of care. They can then make informed decisions about their use to promote effective care planning or as a tool to direct socially inclusive service development.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.