This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aspinall, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aspinall, P. J.
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2006) 12: 141-151
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Informing progress towards race equality in mental healthcare: is routine data collection adequate?

Peter J. Aspinall

Peter Aspinall is a senior research fellow at the University of Kent (Centre for Health Services Studies, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, George Allen Wing, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, UK. E-mail: P.J.Aspinall{at}kent.ac.uk). He is also Honorary Special Advisor to the London Health Observatory and has recently undertaken commissioned research on ethnic disparities in health and healthcare for the Department of Health’s Equality and Human Rights Group and the Welsh Assembly Government. He was National Convenor for the Office for National Statistics 2001 Census Working Group on the Ethnic Group Question and has worked extensively with the London Health Observatory on ethnic health intelligence issues.

The quality, completeness and coverage of ethnicity data in mental health services has long been regarded as unsatisfactory. The Department of Health’s new 5-year action plan for delivering race equality in mental healthcare seeks to improve this key building block by setting out actions to improve both the quality of information and its analysis and dissemination. However, those that are tangible and specific are few: annual surveys of service users, national censuses of mental health in-patients and tables of National Confidential Inquiry suicide cases and in-patient deaths by ethnicity. The opportunity to seek improvements in the quality and coverage of key routine data-sets such as ethnic monitoring in primary care and the Hospital Episode Statistics database has not been seized. Moreover, the plan does not mention proposed changes in civil registration (births and deaths) and the coroner service and their potential benefit. The continuing gaps in the information base justify a stronger emphasis on the processes necessary to bring about change rather than on what ethnic monitoring should provide.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JRSMHome page
V. S Raleigh, G. M Polato, S. A Bremner, S. Dhillon, and A. Deery
Inpatient mental healthcare in England and Wales: patterns in NHS and independent healthcare providers
J R Soc Med, November 1, 2008; 101(11): 544 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
K. Dein, P. S. Williams, and S. Dein
Ethnic bias in the application of the Mental Health Act 1983
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2007; 13(5): 350 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
V. S. Raleigh
Race equality in mental healthcare: is routine data collection adequate?
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2007; 13(5): 394 - 394.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Delivering race equality for our patients
marlene m kelbrick
Advances Online, 18 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Race equality in mental healthcare: is routine data collection adequate?
Veena S Raleigh
Advances Online, 14 Jun 2007 [Full text]