This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in APT
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coles, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coles, C.
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2006) 12: 397-401
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Uncertainty in a world of regulation{dagger}

Colin Coles

Colin Coles is Honorary Research Professor at the Faculty of Education, University of Winchester (Sparkford Road, Winchester SO22 4NR, UK. Email: colin.coles{at}sagainternet.co.uk). His background is in education: he was initially a school teacher and then a university lecturer. He was involved in the research and development of the undergraduate curriculum at the University of Southampton School of Medicine, and educational development within the Wessex Deanery for Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education. His research interests include the development of professional judgement.

Medical practice must be regulated, but the form this currently takes is increasingly based on a ‘technical’ view, which wrongly assumes that practice is straightforward and that error is the result of individual failure. The metaphor of ‘delivery’ is currently used to characterise medical practice but this usage is fundamentally flawed. An alternative is presented, supported by a growing literature, that shows that professional practice generally (and medical practice in particular) is characterised by complexity, uncertainty and unpredictability. Practitioners use their judgement and wisdom, developed in their own practice and in their contacts with fellow practitioners. Often, practitioners choose between options that are not ideal, and may need to decide on what they believe is best for an individual rather than what is ‘right’ in some absolute sense. Doctors must find ways of giving a clearer account of their practice, and in so doing become more truly accountable.


Related articles in APT:

Uncertainty, regulation and psychiatry: INVITED COMMENTARY ON... UNCERTAINTY IN A WORLD OF REGULATION
Fiona Subotsky
APT 2006 12: 402-403. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
N. Crumlish and B. D. Kelly
How psychiatrists think
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2009; 15(1): 72 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
F. Subotsky
Uncertainty, regulation and psychiatry: INVITED COMMENTARY ON... UNCERTAINTY IN A WORLD OF REGULATION
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2006; 12(6): 402 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]