APT E-mail content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2008) 14: 172-180. doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.107.003533
© 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in APT
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hewis, E.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hewis, E.

Detained – what’s my choice? Part 1: Discussion{dagger}

Glenn Roberts, Eluned Dorkins, James Wooldridge and Elaine Hewis

Glenn Roberts is a consultant in rehabilitation and recovery in Devon (Wonford House Hospital, Dryden Road, Exeter EX2 5AF, UK. Email: glennroberts{at}doctors.org.uk). Eluned Dorkins is a consultant forensic psychiatrist at Langdon Hospital, Dawlish, Devon. James Wooldridge is a service avoider, freelance trainer/consultant/speaker and regional coordinator for the Open Up project. Elaine Hewis is a survivor and carer, consultant trainer and lecturer in mental health issues.

Choice, responsibility, recovery and social inclusion are concepts guiding the ‘modernisation’ and redesign of psychiatric services. Each has its advocates and detractors, and at the deep end of mental health/psychiatric practice they all interact. In the context of severe mental health problems choice and social inclusion are often deeply compromised; they are additionally difficult to access when someone is detained and significant aspects of personal responsibility have been temporarily taken over by others. One view is that you cannot recover while others are in control. We disagree and believe that it is possible to work in a recovery-oriented way in all service settings. This series of articles represents a collaborative dialogue between providers and consumers of compulsory psychiatric services and expert commentators. We worked together, reflecting on the literature and our own professional and personal experience to better understand how choice can be worked with as a support for personal recovery even in circumstances of psychiatric detention. We were particularly interested to consider whether and how detention and compulsion could be routes to personal recovery. We offer both the process of our co-working and our specific findings as part of a continuing dialogue on these difficult issues.



Related articles in APT:

Continuing the dialogue: INVITED COMMENTARY ON ...DETAINED – WHAT’S MY CHOICE? PART 1
Mary Ellen Copeland and Shery Mead
APT 2008 14: 181-182. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

A values-based perspective on good practice in compulsion: INVITED COMMENTARY ON ... DETAINED – WHAT’S MY CHOICE? PART 1
K. W. M. Fulford and Malcolm King
APT 2008 14: 183-184. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Detained – what’s my choice? Part 2: Conclusions and recommendations
Eluned Dorkins, Glenn Roberts, James Wooldridge, and Elaine Hewis
APT 2008 14: 184-186. [Abstract] [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.