APT E-mail content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2008) 14: 184-186. doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.107.005199
© 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in APT
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorkins, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hewis, E.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dorkins, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hewis, E.

Detained – what’s my choice? Part 2: Conclusions and recommendations{dagger}

Eluned Dorkins, Glenn Roberts, James Wooldridge and Elaine Hewis

Eluned Dorkins is a consultant forensic psychiatrist at Langdon Hospital, Dawlish, Devon. Glenn Roberts is a consultant in rehabilitation and recovery in Devon (Wonford House Hospital, Dryden Road, Exeter EX2 5AF, UK. Email: glennroberts{at}doctors.org.uk). James Wooldridge is a service avoider, freelance trainer/consultant/speaker and regional coordinator for the Open Up project. Elaine Hewis is a survivor and carer, consultant trainer and lecturer in mental health issues.

We have developed this succession of articles as a series of iterative steps, each seeking to uphold the recovery values of co-working and collaboration, looking for agreement and commonality but valuing equally diverse viewpoints and difference. Our conclusion is that this is the beginning of a creative dialogue on choice as a route to recovery for people who are psychiatrically detained. We commend our method of engaging with the inevitable tensions and dilemmas by: clarifying the story behind difficult interactions, identifying the relevant guiding principles and jointly working to explore from different viewpoints what can be done to promote recovery.



Related articles in APT:

Detained – what’s my choice? Part 1: Discussion
Glenn Roberts, Eluned Dorkins, James Wooldridge, and Elaine Hewis
APT 2008 14: 172-180. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Continuing the dialogue: INVITED COMMENTARY ON ...DETAINED – WHAT’S MY CHOICE? PART 1
Mary Ellen Copeland and Shery Mead
APT 2008 14: 181-182. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

A values-based perspective on good practice in compulsion: INVITED COMMENTARY ON ... DETAINED – WHAT’S MY CHOICE? PART 1
K. W. M. Fulford and Malcolm King
APT 2008 14: 183-184. [Abstract] [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.