Nora Turjanski is currently a specialist registrar in liaison psychiatry at the Royal Free Hospital, London, and has previously trained as a neurologist. Geoffrey Lloyd is a consultant liaison psychiatrist at the Royal Free Hospital (Liaison Psychiatry, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK. Tel: 020 7830 2240, ext. 3589; fax: 020 7472 6261; e-mail: Geoffrey.Lloyd{at}royalfree.nhs.uk). He is currently chair of the Faculty of Liaison Psychiatry within the Royal College of Psychiatrists.
|
|
|---|
Certain criteria need to be met to establish a relationship between a drug and a particular side-effect (Karch & Lasagna, 1975; Ashton & Young, 1998) (Box 1
). Although it is apparent that a diagnosis of a drug-induced side-effect can be made with varying degrees of confidence, ultimately it remains a matter of clinical judgement (Lawson, 1998).
| Box 1 Assessing the medicationside-effect relationship (after Karch & Lasagna, 1975) The strength of the relationship between the administration of a drug and adverse reactions to it can be operationally defined as follows. Definite A reaction that:
Probable A reaction that:
Possible A reaction that:
Conditional A reaction that:
Doubtful Any reaction that does not meet the above criteria
|
In addition to information acquired during pharmaceutical trials, the neuropsychiatric complications induced by newer agents are emerging through single case reports and clinical observations. These case reports do not always provide an adequate description of symptoms nor do they use appropriate psychiatric terminology. Patients often have complex and concurrent problems and tend to be prescribed several drugs simultaneously. However, the reports contain clinically relevant information and are the best available evidence of unwanted effects to date.
In this article we describe psychiatric side-effects induced by commonly used medications other than psychotropics, with emphasis on newer agents. Certain drugs are well recognised for inducing psychiatric side-effects, and we summarise them in Tables 4
, 5
and 6
. Those interested to further their knowledge could refer to Brown & Stoudemiere (1998). We pay special attention to medications used to treat HIV infection, Parkinsons disease and epilepsy. These disorders may present with psychiatric symptoms that can also be caused by the medications used to ameliorate them. The treatment of HIV infection in particular is changing rapidly and it is necessary for clinicians to keep apace with therapeutic innovations.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 4 Psychiatric side-effects of antibiotics |
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 5 Psychiatric side-effects of cardiovascular agents |
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 6 Psychiatric side-effects of immunomodulators |
|
|
|---|
Recent years have seen major advances in HIV treatment, with the prospect of more effective and safer therapeutic alternatives being incorporated in the near future. The emergence of antiretroviral drugs has considerably influenced the clinical expression of the disease as well as the patients survival rates and quality of life. In developed countries antiretrovirals have transformed HIV so that it has become a chronic condition requiring lifetime treatment (Treisman & Kaplan, 2002).
It has been estimated that nearly half of the patients receiving treatment for HIV have psychiatric disorders. Mood disorders are common, with depression having an overall prevalence of 2030% (Bing et al, 2001). There is conflicting evidence on whether the prevalence of mood disorders has increased or decreased following the introduction of antiretrovirals (Catalan et al, 2000; Alciati et al, 2001).
Antiretroviral agents
Antiretroviral drugs are the mainstay of HIV treatment. Table 1
lists currently available drugs, grouped according to their mechanism of action. Many other agents are at a developmental stage.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 1 Common psychiatric side-effects of licensed antiretroviral agents |
The degree of CNS drug penetration may be of particular importance. Lack of penetration could leave the brain as a reservoir for the virus, resulting in CNS infection and lack of final viral clearance (Gonzalez & Everall, 1998). Also, the degree of CNS penetration may relate to the antiretrovirals effectiveness in treating neuropsychiatric manifestations of HIV (Gonzalez & Everall, 1998). The mechanisms underlying the development of neuropsychiatric symptoms in HIV are complex. Several factors interact, including the direct effect of the virus, immune mediators and medications (Treisman & Kaplan, 2002). There is increasing evidence that neuronal damage induced by HIV may be mediated by immune activation and viral infection of brain macrophages and microglia (Swindells et al, 1999). Although effective against CNS infection, antiretrovirals are themselves increasingly recognised as a source of neuropsychiatric disorders. Some side-effects were identified during the trial phases and others have come to light in published case reports. How these drugs exert their deleterious effects on the brain remains poorly understood.
Drugs from the five groups of antiretrovirals have a variable capacity to induce psychiatric disorders (Table 1
).
Protease inhibitors have limited CNS penetration and therefore less-pronounced CNS (neurological and psychiatric) side-effects (Harry et al, 2000; Treisman & Kaplan, 2002). Within this group, ritonavir and saquinavir are more likely to produce neurological side-effects (Treisman & Kaplan, 2002), the others inducing mostly mood disturbances.
Zidovudine was the first drug of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) group introduced for the treatment of HIV. Psychiatric disturbances are usually dose related (Treisman et al, 2002). Didanosine and lamivudine can cause psychiatric complications. Abacavir does not cause prominent psychiatric side-effects, although when used in combination, it may induce psychosis and catatonia (Foster et al, 2003). Tenofovir, a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NtRTI), has not been associated with psychiatric side-effects.
Within the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) group, efavirenz induces a variety of CNS side-effects in up to 50% of patients (Colebunders & Verdonck, 1999), which may be severe and sudden in onset (Lang et al, 2001; Peyriere et al, 2001; Sanz de la Garza et al, 2001; Sabato et al, 2002). Symptoms include twilight states, personality changes, with increased hostility, and cognitive disturbances (Lang et al, 2001; Treisman & Kaplan, 2002). Efavirenz treatment may be particularly associated with major depression and severe suicidal ideation (Puzantian, 2002). Side-effects of the drug tend to present within the first 4 weeks of treatment and may subside spontaneously despite continuation of treatment (Colebunders & Verdonck, 1999). A possible association with high drug plasma levels remains unconfirmed. Side-effects have been described in patients without psychiatric antecedents, but those with a previous psychiatric history are more vulnerable and should be monitored closely (Peyriere et al, 2001). Side-effects are reduced with bedtime dosing (Treisman & Kaplan, 2002), although patients often experience vivid dreams. Side-effects are less common with delavirdine and nevirapine (Treisman & Kaplan, 2002).
Treatment of psychiatric complications
The diagnosis of antiretroviral-induced psychiatric side-effects requires the exclusion of other causes, as well as consideration of the additive effects of medications. Antiretroviral drug-level monitoring may be helpful.
The treatment of antiretroviral-induced psychiatric disturbance varies according to its severity. Mild symptoms should be monitored, and psychotropics may be added if required. Severe cases may require switching or discontinuing the HAART regimen, which could be reinstated (often with different medication) once the patient improves.
Current guidelines recommend aggressive treatment of HAART-induced depression, especially if there is a previous psychiatric history, as well as considering switching the HAART regimen (Treisman & Kaplan, 2002). In severe cases, efavirenz has to be discontinued (Peyriere et al, 2001), which can result in rapid improvement (Sanz de la Garza et al, 2001). However, efavirenz has a long half-life and therefore side-effects may persist for several weeks.
In patients with depression about to start HAART, guidelines suggest first an active treatment of the depression, with HAART initiation depending on the degree of immunosuppression, HIV load and CD4 T-cell counts. Effective treatment of psychiatric complications may improve HAART adherence (Treisman & Kaplan, 2002).
Psychotropic medication may be required to treat psychiatric symptoms resulting either from the HIV CNS infection or from the HAART treatment (Sanz de la Garza et al, 2001). However, patients with HIV have increased sensitivity to psychotropics and care is required because of the additive side-effects of the different medications (Everall et al, 2004). Psychotropics and antiretrovirals have complex metabolic interactions at the level of the cytochrome P450 family of hepatic enzymes (Tseng & Fosy, 1999). Some of these interactions are bidirectional, leading to changed levels of both groups of drugs. Within the protease inhibitors, ritonavir is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2D6 isoenzyme, which metabolises tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), newer antidepressants (paroxetine, venlafaxine and fluvoxamine) and many antipsychotics, including risperidone. Concomitant administration of ritonavir with these psychotropics may lead to toxic blood levels of both. Protease inhibitors and NNRTIs can either increase or decrease levels of a wide variety of psychotropics by their action on the CYP3A4 isoenzyme. This enzyme is a more common site of protease inhibitor effects.
Psychiatrists are advised to consult pharmacy services for advice on possible interactions when prescribing psychotropics to an HIV-infected patient. Low doses of psychotropics should be used initially (between a quarter and a half of the usual starting dose) and increased gradually (Everall et al, 2004).
Several antidepressants are useful in these patients (Box 2
). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are generally well tolerated, although they may induce gastrointestinal disturbances (Everall et al, 2004). Some SSRIs (e.g. fluoxetine, fluvoxamine) interact with specific antiretrovirals, so possible interactions should be checked (for further information see Stockley, 2002; British Medical Association & Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2004; www.emims.net; www.epocrates.com).
| Box 2 Preferred psychotropics in patients receiving antiretrovirals (after Everall et al, 2004) Antidepressants Citalopram, sertraline, mirtazepine, reboxetine and venlaflaxine (there are important interactions between some SSRIs and specific antiretrovirals) Antipsychotics Olanzapine, risperidone (except with ritonavir), amisulpride and sulpiride Mood stabilisers Valproate, lamotrigine Anxiolytics Short-acting benzodiazepines: oxazepam, lorazepam and temazepam Zopiclone
|
Of major importance is the interaction between antiretrovirals and St Johns wort, a herbal remedy commonly used to treat anxiety and depression. This compound significantly reduces levels of protease inhibitor and NNRTIs and may lead to treatment failure (James, 2000; Piscitelli et al, 2000). Protease inhibitors and NNRTIs interact with diazepam, midazolam, alprazolam and zolpidem, causing marked benzodiazepine effects.
Patients with HIV have increased sensitivity to neuroleptics, with frequent emergence of extrapyramidal side-effects (Meyer et al, 1998). Although similar extrapyramidal reactions have been occasionally described with atypical antipsychotics (Meyer et al, 1998), these are usually easier to use (Treisman & Kaplan, 2002). Clozapine has shown good results in HIV-infected patients with associated psychosis, although there are concerns regarding higher risk of bone marrow toxicity (Lera & Zirulnik, 1999). Clozapine is contraindicated in patients receiving protease inhibitors (Everall et al, 2004).
Clinically significant interactions have been observed between antiretrovirals in general and many classes of recreational drugs. Protease inhibitors inhibit metabolism of many of these drugs, particularly rave drugs such as methylene dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), amphetamine and ketamine, resulting in toxic overdoses (Antoniou & Tseng, 2002). Protease inhibitors and NNRTIs induce methadone metabolism, leading to methadone withdrawal symptoms (Antoniou & Tseng, 2002). It is still unclear whether this metabolic interaction is bidirectional (Treisman & Kaplan, 2002).
|
|
|---|
The spectrum of psychotic symptoms in parkinsonism ranges from isolated perceptual disturbances to delirium. Hallucinations can be experienced in any sensory modality, although isolated visual hallucinations are the most frequent symptom and can occur in up to 30% of patients (Factor et al, 1995). With disease progression, drug-induced visual hallucinations become pervasive and frightening and are accompanied by auditory hallucinations and delusions (Melamed et al, 1999). These tend to involve themes of persecution, spousal infidelity or jealousy. Sleep disturbances or vivid dreams may predict development of dopaminomimetic psychosis. Elderly patients with cognitive disturbance are especially vulnerable (Wolters, 1999).
Parkinsons disease population studies have shown that psychotic symptoms have multiple aetiological factors, including medication, disease severity, cognitive deficits and impaired visual acuity (Aarsland et al, 1999a; Holroyd et al, 2001). With progression of the disease, a high proportion of patients develop L-dopa-induced motor fluctuations known as on (improved mobility) and off (decreased mobility, when there is no response to dopaminomimetics) phases. Patients with late-stage Parkinsons disease may experience several daily onoff fluctuations and usually require higher doses of L-dopa and polypharmacy, which increases the risk of developing psychotic symptoms (Garcia-Escrig et al, 1999).
Fluctuations in mobility are temporally associated with phasic alterations in mood and anxiety and, in rare circumstances, with psychotic symptoms (Maricle et al, 1995). A feeling of elation may occur during the on phase and patients occasionally present with hypomania and sexually disinhibited behaviour (Nissenbaum et al, 1987; Riley & Lang, 1993). More common are depressive symptoms and hallucinations during the off phase (Nissenbaum et al, 1987; Riley & Lang, 1993). The relationship between these psychological changes and medication remains unclear.
Psychotic symptoms and medication have a complex relationship. Psychotic symptoms during the late stages of the disease may be associated with global cognitive impairment, whereas those starting within 5 years of disease onset may correspond to overactivity of the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic pathways (Wolters et al, 1994; Graham et al, 1997). Dysfunctional neurotransmitter circuits may be rendered hypersensitive by pulsatile exogenous dopaminergic treatment, in a fashion similar to that which occurs within the motor system (Wolters, 1999). Hence, the neurotransmitter changes occurring in Parkinsons disease are difficult to extricate from the effects of medication on these systems.
All antiparkinsonian medications may induce delirium and psychosis because of their catecholaminergic properties (Table 2
). Dopaminomimetics exert their motor actions by increasing levels of dopamine in the synaptic cleft either through a precusor (L-dopa preparations) or by reducing dopamine degradation by monoamine-oxidaseB (MAOB) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors. Dopamine agonists act by direct stimulation of dopamine basal ganglia receptors. Other useful adjuncts include antimuscarinics and amantadine, also an antiviral agent, which is more prone to cause psychosis when administered with dopaminomimetics (Garcia-Escrig et al, 1999).
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 2 Psychiatric side-effects of antiparkinsonian drugs |
The presence of psychotic symptoms in Parkinsons disease requires a review of the patients previous history. In patients with early-onset disease (aged less than 40), psychosis may represent the disclosure of an underlying psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia by the use of dopaminergic therapy in predisposed individuals (Cannas et al, 2001).
Psychotic symptoms that do not improve following discontinuation of antiparkinsonian medication may herald the presentation of Lewy body dementia or other dementias (McKeith et al, 1996).
Treatment of psychiatric complications
Isolated visual hallucinations and psychotic symptoms usually respond to general support and reassurance and adjustment of total daily dose of antiparkinsonian medications (Box 3
) (Wolters, 1999; Friedman & Factor, 2000; Catalan-Alonso & Del Val, 2001). In rare instances psychotic symptoms occur only in the off stage and therefore may require an increased dose of dopaminomimetics (Nissenbaum et al, 1987).
| Box 3 Treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with Parkinsons disease receiving dopaminomimetics Treatment of psychosis General measures
Medication
Treatment of depression General measures
Medication and other treatments
|
Antipsychotic drugs are required if psychotic symptoms do not respond to these measures. The older antipsychotics have D2-receptor antagonism and therefore induce deterioration of mobility in Parkinsons disease. Atypical antipsychotics should be used cautiously in patients with the disease, starting at low doses to minimise drowsiness, orthostatic hypotension and delirium and to allow monitoring of mobility. Clozapine is the only drug with confirmed benefit for psychosis in Parkinsons disease (Melamed et al, 1999; Friedman & Factor, 2000). In daily doses of up to 50 mg it effectively reduces drug-induced psychotic symptoms without inducing a marked motor deterioration (Parkinson Study Group, 1999; Wolters, 1999). Beneficial effects, even in patients with dementia, have been shown to be sustained for up to 5 years (Klein et al, 2003). Additionally, clozapine has been shown to reduce tremor, hypersexuality and sleep disturbances in Parkinsons disease (Trosch et al, 1998).
Results with other atypical antipsychotics are less impressive. Even low doses of risperidone (up to 3mg/day) and olanzapine (up to 7.5mg/day) may be detrimental to mobility (Wolters et al, 1996; Aarsland et al, 1999b; Wolters, 1999; Goetz et al, 2000; Manson et al, 2000; Mohr et al, 2000).
Limited data suggest that quetiapine (average dose of 60mg/day) may be beneficial and better tolerated than other atypicals (Friedman & Factor, 2000; Targum & Abbott, 2000; Fernandez et al, 2002, 2003). Patients with dementia are less likely to respond (Fernandez et al, 2003). In such patients, preliminary studies with cholinesterase inhibitors such as rivastigmine and donepezil have shown improvement of psychotic symptoms without motor deterioration (Reading et al, 2001; Bergman & Lerner, 2002; Tolosa, 2003). On occasions the only alternative is to reach a compromise with patient and carers regarding psychotic symptoms and degree of mobility.
Treatment of psychotic symptoms in dementia with Lewy bodies needs to be instigated cautiously. Up to 50% of patients with Lewy body dementia treated with the older neuroleptics experience life-threatening exacerbation of parkinsonism and confusion (Barber et al, 2001). They may experience extrapyramidal side-effects even with small doses of atypical antipsychotics and a minority develop features of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (Barber et al, 2001). It has been suggested that quetiapine can be beneficial (Fernandez et al, 2002). Cholinesterase inhibitors are a valid therapeutic alternative, as they improve non-cognitive as well as cognitive symptoms in Lewy body dementia (Barber et al, 2001). This therapeutic effect possibly results from enhanced cortical muscarinic activation. In Lewy body dementia these cholinergic post-synaptic receptors are relatively better preserved than the cholinergic ascending presynaptic projections (Barber et al, 2001).
Symptoms of depression greatly affect quality of life for patients with Parkinsons disease and their relatives. They require active treatment. Mood fluctuations associated with the off periods must be carefully explained to patient and caregivers. Dopaminergic therapy itself does not have a major antidepressant role. MAOB and COMT inhibitors might enhance mood, but there are no systematic trials to support their use as antidepressants (Tiffani & Cummings, 1998). Most antidepressants can be used to treat depression in Parkinsons disease although there are isolated case reports of worsened parkinsonism with SSRIs (Valldeoriola et al, 1997).
Combination of SSRIs or tricyclics and MAOB inhibitors such as selegiline could precipitate a serotonin syndrome and should not be used (Valldeoriola et al, 1997; Tiffani & Cummings, 1998).
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is effective in the treatment of severe depression in patients with Parkinsons disease (Cote, 1999). Both motor and depressive symptoms respond to ECT, but relapse can occur soon after it is discontinued (Holcomb et al, 1983; Tiffani & Cummings, 1998). Parkinsonian patients have an increased susceptibility to developing interictal delirium perhaps secondary to basal ganglia lesions or to ECT premedication (Tiffani & Cummings, 1998). Psychotherapy and support groups occupy a central role in the treatment of depression in these patients (Cote, 1999).
|
|
|---|
Psychiatric symptoms are usually described according to their temporal association with seizures as ictal, interictal or postictal. Changes in mood surrounding seizures are common and may last several hours or, rarely, several days (Kanner & Rivas Nieto, 1999). Many patients have atypical presentations with episodic dysphoria and chronic dysthymia. It has been suggested that supra-optimal seizure control (forced normalisation) or spontaneous cessation of seizures may induce a paradoxical agitation, implying an antagonistic relationship between psychosis and seizures (Trimble, 1991).
Suicide risk is increased fourfold in patients with epilepsy. The highest risk is seen in patients who have been recently diagnosed, in those with temporal lobe epilepsy and in those with more severe epileptic or concurrent psychiatric disorders (Vuilleumier & Jallon, 1998; Kanner & Rivas Nieto, 1999).
Anti-epileptic medication
All anti-epileptics can induce psychiatric disturbances (Table 3
). Delirium and other cognitive changes are particularly common (Kanner & Rivas Nieto, 1999). Patients may require more than one anti-epileptic to control seizures, with increased risk of toxic levels due to metabolic interactions.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 3 Psychiatric side-effects of anti-epileptics |
The newer anti-epileptics are also associated with the development of psychiatric complications. Two molecules closely related to established anti-epileptics are oxcarbazepine and fosphenytoin, which have a profile of side-effects similar to that of their predecessors. Other recently introduced anti-epileptics include vigabatrin, topiramate, tiagabine, gabapentin, lamotrigine and levetiracetam.
Vigabatrin causes few cognitive side-effects, but can result in transient psychosis (Guberman, 1996; Levinson & Devinsky, 1999). Increased risk has been associated with a right-sided epileptic focus and acute suppression of seizures (Thomas et al, 1996).
Topiramate, and to a lesser degree tiagabine, can induce psychosis (Ketter et al, 1999; Khan et al, 1999). Side-effects are less likely using lower starting doses and slow titration (Adkins & Noble, 1998; Kalviainen, 2001; Sackellares et al, 2002).
Gabapentin and lamotrigine do not appear to be strongly associated with development of psychiatric disturbances, including cognitive dysfunction (Ketter et al, 1999).
The withdrawal of anti-epileptics may cause prominent psychiatric symptoms, including psychosis. This is well recognised for barbiturates and benzodiazepines. However, withdrawal of phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproate has been implicated in the development of psychiatric symptoms in up to 40% of patients with epilepsy (Ketter et al, 1999).
Of the newer drugs, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine appear to have mood-stabilising effects; there is insufficient information regarding other compounds (Ketter et al, 1999; Besag, 2001).
Treatment of psychiatric complications
The treatment of psychiatric symptoms requires establishing whether these are temporally associated with seizures, result from iatrogenic effects of anti-epileptic medication or have an alternative cause. Psychiatric symptoms may emerge after a recent withdrawal of medication or a change in dose. A psychiatric disorder induced by an anti-epileptic drug may respond to a reduced dosage or a change of medication.
Psychotropic drugs should be used with caution in patients with epilepsy, because of their tendency to increase seizure frequency. Overall, seizures occur in 1% of patients taking antipsychotics (Lancman, 1999). Treatment with antipsychotics should be initiated at low doses and increased slowly. Butyrophenones, risperidone and olanzapine are less likely to induce seizures than are phenothiazines. Clozapine has a dose-related higher risk for seizures (Lancman, 1999).
Tricyclic antidepressants are more proconvulsant than MAOA inhibitors or SSRIs, although this action appears to relate to the antidepressants plasma levels, but not to their intrinsic action over brain concentrations of monoamines (Kanner & Rivas Nieto, 1999). Antidepressants should be started at small doses and increased cautiously, to minimise risk of seizures. Owing to their side-effects profile, SSRIs are recommended as first-line treatment of depression in epilepsy (Kanner & Rivas Nieto, 1999). Newer antidepressants such as moclobemide and venlafaxine do not appear to be proconvulsant (Lambert & Robertson, 1999).
Antidepressants and anti-epileptics, which are both metabolised in the liver, may have pharmacological interactions and these should be checked with regard to specific combinations. Electroconvulsive therapy can be used if antidepressants are ineffective or inappropriate (Kanner & Rivas Nieto, 1999; Lambert & Robertson, 1999).
The role of carbamazepine and sodium valproate in the treatment of bipolar disorder in epilepsy has not been established. Withdrawal of these medications can unmask a bipolar disorder (Kanner & Rivas Nieto, 1999). Lithium is proconvulsant at therapeutic serum concentrations (Kanner et al, 1999). Treatment response can be optimised by behavioural and cognitive therapies combined with education of patients and carers (Kanner & Rivas Nieto, 1999).
|
|
|---|
Treatment of psychiatric side-effects
The general principles of treatment for antibiotics and the remaining medications mentioned below are similar to those already discussed, namely reducing dosage or discontinuing the responsible medication. On occasions, patients may need additional use of psychotropics to control symptoms.
|
|
|---|
There have been claims that drugs used to lower cholesterol may increase the risk of suicide, but these have not been substantiated (Brunner et al, 2002).
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Uncommonly, drugs within this group are associated with psychosis and with delirium secondary to aseptic meningitis. Corticosteroids cause psychiatric symptoms either directly or indirectly by affecting the patients metabolic status. Withdrawal of corticosteroids may induce insomnia, mood changes and cognitive impairment. Intravenous infusion of immunoglobulins is associated with anxiety. Sulfasalazine side-effects are dose dependent, with increased occurrence of delirium when daily doses exceed 4 g (Brown & Stoudemiere, 1998). Indirectly, it causes psychiatric symptoms through development of cerebral lupus erythematosus. Newer antihistamines, H1 antagonists, have poor CNS penetration and hence less-marked neuropsychiatric side-effects.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] | MCQ answers |
|
|
|---|
Read all eLetters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||