Salman Karim is a lecturer in old age psychiatry at University of Manchester (Division of Psychiatry, Education and Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, UK. Tel: 0161 291 5867/5884; fax: 0161 291 5882; e-mail: skarim{at}fs1.with.man.ac.uk). His special interests are schizophrenia in elderly people and the role of inflammation in the aetiology of Alzheimers disease. Eleanor Byrne is a senior lecturer in old age psychiatry at the University of Manchester with a special interest in dementia with Lewy bodies.
|
|
|---|
Among elderly patients psychotic symptoms can be seen in a wide range of conditions. The causes and clinical manifestations of the symptoms usually vary with the underlying condition. Psychotic symptoms of acute onset are usually seen in delirium secondary to a medical condition, drug misuse and drug-induced psychosis. Chronic and persistent psychotic symptoms may be due to a primary psychotic disorder (chronic schizophrenia, late-onset schizophrenia, delusional disorders, affective disorders), psychosis owing to neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimers disease, vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinsons disease) or chronic medical conditions.
Psychotic symptoms are not uncommon in the elderly population and prevalence figures in community samples range from 0.2 to 4.7% (Targum & Abbott, 1999). In nursing homes prevalence rates from 10% to as high as 63% have been reported (Zayas & Grossberg, 1998). In a 3-year follow-up study of psychotic symptoms in a population-based sample of very old people (above 85 years of age) without dementia, Östling & Skoog (2002) reported a prevalence of 7.113.7%. They also reported that hallucinations and paranoid ideation were associated with increased incidence of dementia and mortality within 3 years.
Psychotic symptoms can be associated with aggressive or disruptive behaviour (Gilley et al, 1997) and are often a source of distress to caregivers (Zarit et al, 1986; Schneider et al, 1997). They can result in neglect and abuse of elderly patients (Steele et al, 1990) and persistent symptoms often result in institutionalisation, which imposes a heavy financial burden (Stern et al, 1997).
A number of factors have been hypothesised to contribute to an increased risk of psychosis in elderly people (Box 1
), and the combination of these make its management complicated in older patients.
Box 1 Increased risk of psychosis in elderly people: contributing factors
(Targum & Abbott, 1999; Targum & Steven, 2001)
|
|
|
|---|
| Box 2 Potential side-effects of antipsychotics in elderly people Extrapyramidal side-effects
Tardive dyskinesia Anticholinergic effects
Postural hypotention Sedation Hypersalivation Gastrointestinal effects
Liver effects
Cardiovascular effects
Endocrine effects
Epilepsy
|
Antipsychotics can also increase the rate of cognitive decline (Holmes et al, 1997; McShane et al, 1997); they have been associated with neuroleptic sensitivity syndrome, a potentially lethal adverse effect (Byrne et al, 1992; McKeith et al, 1992); and some are now subject to restrictions under the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM). Having reviewed the literature on the use of risperidone and olanzapine for the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia, the chairman of the CSM concluded that each was associated with at least a two-fold increase in the risk of stroke and therefore should no longer be used in dementia (Duff, 2004). Herrmann et al(2004), however, found no difference in the risk of stroke between risperidone and olanzapine compared with typical neuroleptics used in the treatment of dementia (n=11400). Others have subsequently commented on the potential detrimental effects of such a blanket ban (Mowat et al, 2004).
Following the CSM restriction on risperidone and olanzapine, a Working Group for the Royal College of Psychiatrists Faculty of the Psychiatry of Old Age, the Royal College of General Practitioners, the British Geriatrics Society and the Alzheimers Society also acknowledged a small but significant risk of cerebrovascular adverse events in elderly people, especially in people over 80 years of age, with the use of risperidone and olanzapine (Royal College of Psychiatrists et al, 2004). The Working Group advocated a more balanced approach to their prescription that involves weighing the risks and benefits for individual patients, since these drugs may still be worth using in some circumstances, particularly when alternative drug treatments have similar or worse side-effects and non-pharmacological approaches are not suitable. For other antipsychotics, both typical and atypical, the choice of prescription should be based on the side-effect profile and risk factors such as cerebrovascular events, postural hypotension and tardive dyskinesia. For people who have been stable on antipsychotics for more than 3 months, cautious withdrawal may be considered. The decision to withdraw or continue should be based on past history and the risks of recurrence. The reasons for using or continuing a particular antipsychotic must be clearly documented and the general practitioner should be involved in the decision-making process.
The discussions about the use and safety of antipsychotics will probably go on for some time, but they have highlighted the need for research on alternative forms of treatment. For the present, it is important to be careful not to do more harm than good when initiating antipsychotic medication for older people and to follow the principle start low and go slow (Zayas & Grossberg, 2002).
|
|
|---|
There has since been much debate about the nosology and classification of psychotic disorders in old age. Some emphasise the similarities between the early- and late-onset illnesses and others highlight the differences in aetiology, phenomenology and outcome. A consensus on nomenclature was reached in 1998, at a meeting of the International Late Onset Schizophrenia Group (Howard et al, 2000). On the basis of the research evidence on symptoms, family history, brain imaging studies and the nature of the cognitive deficits observed, it was agreed to retain the word schizophrenia for both the early- and late-onset illnesses. However, the late-onset illness was further subdivided into late onset (onset after 40 years of age) and very late onset (onset after 60 years of age). Some comparative features of early-and late-onset schizophrenia are shown in Box 3
, and characteristics of the very-late-onset illness are listed in Box 4
.
| Box 3 Similarities and differences between early- and late-onset schizophrenia Similarities
Differences Late-onset schizophrenia is characterised by:
|
| Box 4 Characteristic features of very-late-onset schizophrenia Compared with early- or late-onset schizophrenia, very-late-onset schizophrenia is characterised by:
(Lisa et al, 2002; Tune & Salzman, 2003)
|
This classification is, however, not considered final and there is much room for further debate and research. Moreover, there are no separate categories for late-onset and very-late-onset schizophrenia in either DSMIVTR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) or ICD10 (World Health Organization, 1992).
The prevalence of schizophrenia (early, late and very late onset combined) in the population aged 65 years and above is believed to be about 1% (Cohen et al, 2000). Out of these, nearly 25% have late- or very-late-onset illness, and the remaining 75% are people with early-onset schizophrenia who have reached old age (Jeste & Twamley, 2003).
Pharmacological treatment
Antipsychotic medications are the most widely used pharmacological treatment for both early- and late-onset schizophrenia in elderly people. Although there is a dearth of well-conducted studies (with few randomised controlled trials), there is some evidence that these drugs improve acute symptoms and prevent relapse (Jeste et al, 1996).
Conventional antipsychotics
The research literature on the use of conventional antipsychotics in elderly people with schizophrenia is sparse and there are very few recent studies. Significant improvement in psychotic symptoms with the use of haloperidol, trifluoperazine (1030 mg/day) and thioridazine (4050 mg/day) was reported in studies carried out in the 1960s (Post, 1966; Tsuang et al, 1971). Thioridazine has since been shown to cause prolongation of the QT interval and its use in elderly people is not recommended.
Depot antipsychotic medication can be useful in elderly patients who have problems adhering to medication regimens. Howard & Levy (1992) reported that low doses of depot antipsychotics (14.4 mg of flupentixol decanoate or 9 mg of fluphenazine decanoate every 2 weeks) were associated with improved adherence and treatment outcome compared with oral medication.
Atypical antipsychotics
The newer atypical antipsychotics are currently considered the first-line treatment for older patients owing to their better side-effect profile in comparison with conventional antipsychotics (Tune & Salzman, 2003). However, limited data are available from controlled trials showing their efficacy and safety in older people.
Clozapine
The usefulness of clozapine for treatment-resistant early-onset schizophrenia is well established, but concerns about toxicity and the need for monitoring white cell counts has led to limited use in older patients. A few small studies on its use at lower doses in this population have reported sedation, lethargy and postural hypotension as common side-effects (reviewed by Barak et al, 1999). In their review Barak et al concluded that most showed moderate-to-marked improvement of psychotic features at a relatively low mean dose of 134 mg/day, but cautioned that agranulocytosis may occur more frequently in older people. In light of these risks, clozapine is not a first-line antipsychotic for elderly patients and should probably be used only in cases of treatment resistance and severe tardive dyskinesia (Howard, 2002).
Risperidone and olanzapine
Of the atypicals, risperidone is the most extensively studied in the elderly population. It is effective, well tolerated in low doses (1.56 mg/day) and produces significant clinical improvement in elderly people with schizophrenia (Katz et al, 1999; Madhusoodanan et al, 1999). Limited data are available on the use of olanzapine in treating older people with schizophrenia. Madhusoodanan et al(1999) compared 151 hospitalised elderly psychiatric patients (mean age 71 years) who received either risperidone or olanzapine. Olanzapine therapy was found to be effective, with side-effects reported in 17% of the patients, and the authors concluded that the drug was safe and effective in that population. Sajatovic et al(1998) studied olanzapine in an open-label trial with 22 older patients with schizophrenia. They found that it significantly improved symptoms of schizophrenia and had few extrapyramidal side-effects without adversely affecting comorbid medical problems. Owing to recent concerns about the side-effects of these two antipsychotics in people with dementia, their use is also likely to be restricted in people with schizophrenia.
Quetiapine
On the basis of their review of the literature, Zayas & Grossberg (2002) have suggested that quetiapine is safe for use in elderly people and is not associated with weight gain. To avoid the common side-effects of postural hypotention, dizziness and agitation, they recommend starting with the lowest possible dose (25 mg) and slowly titrating up to 100300 mg/day. More recently, Jaskiw et al(2004), in a multicentred open-label trial, have reported safe use in dosages up to 750 mg/day, given in divided doses. As no other study has reported use of quetiapine in such high doses for elderly people, we suspect that only an occasional patient would require a very high dose.
Aripiprazole
The latest of the atypical anti-psychotics aripiprazole, with its unique mode of action as a partial agonist at receptors can be D2 effective in improving both positive and negative symptoms. Furthermore, it is less likely than the other atypicals to cause extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, weight gain and cardiovascular side-effects (Hirose et al, 2004). It probably holds promise for both young and older people with schizophrenia, but there are few data on its use, safety and dosing strategies in older people. Madhusoodanan et al(2004) described their clinical experience of aripiprazole in ten elderly people with schizophrenia. They concluded that it is safe, improved both positive and negative symptoms and caused fewer side-effects.
Dosage
Suggested daily doses of various atypicals for elderly people are given in Table 1
(no data are available for aripiprazole). These should be taken as a guideline only and the dosing regimen should be tailored to the needs of individual patients. The already mentioned strategy of starting low and going slow is probably the safest way of using the newer anti-psychotics for which robust safety data are lacking.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 1 Recommended doses of atypical anti-psychotics for elderly people |
Cognitivebehavioural therapy
The usefulness of cognitivebehavioural techniques in modifying delusional beliefs and controlling hallucinations has been widely reported in younger people (Garety et al, 1994; Fowler et al, 1995). Unfortunately, there have been few attempts to study their use with elderly patients. Agüera-Ortiz et al(1999) have suggested that they might help elderly people gain insight into their illness and provide them with coping strategies to help them live a meaningful life.
McQuaid et al(2000) have developed a novel intervention for older people with schizophrenia that integrates cognitivebehavioural techniques and social skills training. This approach suits the needs of elderly people and aims at reducing their cognitive vulnerabilities and improving their ability to cope with stress and to adhere to other forms of treatment.
Psychosocial therapies
The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in improving independent living and social skills in younger people with schizophrenia is well established (Kopelowicz & Liberman, 1998). Such interventions may also be of importance for elderly patients, a significant number of whom fail to show a complete response to antipsychotics (Howard, 2002). Bartels et al(2004), in a pilot study of elderly people with severe mental illness, found that a combination of interpersonal and independent skills training, together with standard occupational therapy, was associated with improved social functioning and independent living.
|
|
|---|
Alzheimers disease
The prevalence of psychosis in people with Alzheimers disease ranges between 30 and 50% (Jeste & Finkel, 2000). Bassiony et al(2000), in a community-based study of Alzheimers disease, reported that about one-third of the participants showed evidence of psychotic symptoms and that delusions were more common than hallucinations.
The question of whether delusions in Alzheimers disease (Box 5
) are secondary to the cognitive deficits or are true psychotic phenomena remains unanswered. Hallucinations in Alzheimers disease can occur in any sensory modality, but visual and auditory hallucinations are the most common (Tariot, 1995). There is some evidence of the association of psychotic symptoms with a rapid decline in cognition in Alzheimers disease (Förstl et al, 1994; Levy et al, 1999).
Box 5 Four common types of misidentifying delusion seen in individuals with Alzheimers disease
|
Pharmacological treatment of psychosis
Antipsychotics
Antipsychotics have been the most widely used form of treatment for psychosis in Alzheimers disease (Margallo-Lana et al, 2001), although not without concerns about the safety of their use, as discussed above. A number of fairly recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of antipsychotics in controlling psychotic symptoms. However, most of these were designed to look at the usefulness of these drugs in controlling the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, not its psychotic symptoms.
Schneider (1996), in a meta-analysis of seven placebo-controlled trials of the use of typical anti-psychotics, reported significant but modest efficacy. Devanand et al(1998), in a randomised placebo-controlled dose-comparison trial of haloperidol, reported superior efficacy of doses of 23 mg/day, with moderate-to-severe extrapyramidal symptoms occurring in 20% of patients; a lower dose (0.50.75 mg/day) was no better than placebo.
Of the atypical antipsychotics, there have been a number of randomised placebo-controlled trials of risperidone and olanzapine.
Katz et al(1999), in a randomised double-blind trial comparing risperidone with placebo in nursing-home patients, demonstrated the efficacy of risperidone over placebo; the optimal dose was 1 mg/day. Other studies (De Deyn et al, 1999; Brodaty et al, 2003) have confirmed the efficacy of low doses of risperidone for controlling psychotic symptoms in Alzheimers disease.
Olanzapine in a dose of 5 mg/day significantly improved psychotic symptoms in Alzheimers disease in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of 6 weeks duration. Higher doses (10 and 15 mg) showed no added benefit. An open-label follow-up showed that the improvement could be maintained (Street et al, 2000, 2001).
Quetiapine in a dose of 100300 mg/day has been reported to be well tolerated and to improve psychotic symptoms and hostility in people with Alzheimers disease (McManus et al, 1999; Tariot et al, 2000; Yeung et al, 2000).
Cholinesterase inhibitors These are routinely used for cognitive deficits in Alzheimers disease, and more recently their possible usefulness in improving psychotic symptoms has been investigated. Although there have been no prospective double-blind studies, reviews of current data (most studies have been on rivastigmine, donepezil and galantamine) suggest that these drugs are well tolerated and may be of value in preventing or reducing psychotic symptoms in Alzheimer s disease (Finkel, 2004; Wynn & Cummings, 2004).
Dementia with Lewy bodies
Dementia with Lewy bodies is probably a part of the spectrum of Lewy body disorders (Byrne, 1997). Its clinical presentation usually varies according to the site of Lewy body formation and associated neuronal pathology. Psychotic symptoms are seen more frequently in Lewy body dementia than in Alzheimers disease. Visual hallucinations are the most common symptom and have been reported in up to 80% of cases; other classic symptoms include fluctuating cognition, Parkinsonian motor symptoms, frequent falls and sensitivity to neuroleptic medication (McKeith et al, 1994). Auditory hallucinations and paranoid delusions are also common, with prevalence rates of 20% and 65%, respectively (McKeith et al, 1996).
The treatment of psychotic symptoms in Lewy body dementia remains a challenge and most often requires a treatment plan tailored to the characteristics of individual patients. This should strike a balance between use of anti-Parkinsonian medication, which improves motor disorder but may induce psychotic symptoms, or not treating motor symptoms and cautiously treating the psychotic symptoms. This challenge also highlights the importance of non-pharmacological interventions (see below).
Pharmacological treatment
Antipsychotics
People with Lewy body dementia are extremely sensitive to antipsychotics. Small doses can lead to extreme worsening of Parkinsonian symptoms, and about 50% of individuals experience life-threatening adverse effects (McKeith et al, 1992). Severe reactions may be dose related (Byrne et al, 1992). The above-mentioned adverse effects of neuroleptics in older people have discouraged their use and consequently no robustly designed studies of antipsychotics in Lewy body dementia have been carried out. However, some reports on the use of olanzapine in this population have been published (Walker et al, 1999; Cummings et al, 2002).
Cholinesterase inhibitors
A number of studies have reported improvement of psychotic symptoms with the use of cholinesterase inhibitors in Lewy body dementia. A large multicentre double-blind trial comparing rivastigmine with placebo showed significant improvements in delusions and hallucinations (McKeith et al, 2000). Beneficial effects of the use of donepezil have also been reported (Fergusson & Howard, 2000).
Cholinesterase inhibitors are not yet licensed for the treatment of Lewy body dementia in the UK.
Parkinsons disease
Psychotic symptoms in Parkinsons disease are most commonly extrinsic (resulting from treatment with anti-Parkinsonian drugs) and only occasionally intrinsic (secondary to the neurodegenerative process involving dopamine-producing cells in other parts of the brain) (Wolters, 2001). Most anti-Parkinsonian drugs (including levodopa, dopamine receptor agonists, dopamine release enhancers such as amantadine, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors such as selegiline) can cause psychotic symptoms.
Between 20 and 60% of people with Parkinsons disease develop psychotic symptoms (Kuzuhara, 2001; Wolters & Berendse, 2001). Hallucinations are more frequent than delusions in extrinsic cases (Aarsland et al, 1999) and visual hallucinations are more common than hallucinations in other sensory modalities (Hoeh et al, 2003). Epidemiological studies have found that the risk of psychotic symptoms in Parkinsons disease is higher in later stages of the disease and when there is concurrent dementia or depressive illness (Aarsland et al, 1999; Giladi et al, 2000).
Pharmacological treatment
Antipsychotics
Treatment of psychotic symptoms in Parkinsons disease is difficult owing to older peoples sensitivity to antipsychotics in general and to typical antipsychotics in particular. Clozapine has been the most widely used and studied anti-psychotic. Several double-blind controlled trials have established its efficacy. The optimal dose to reduce symptoms and minimise side-effects is 6.2550 mg/day (Hoeh et al, 2003).
There have been several retrospective reports and open-label trials on other atypicals such as risperidone and olanzapine, but none has been shown to improve psychotic symptoms without worsening extrapyramidal symptoms (Breier et al, 2002; Ondo et al, 2002).
Cholinesterase inhibitors
There have been encouraging reports on the success of cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil and rivastigmine in improving both psychotic symptoms and cognitive deficits in Parkinsons disease (Bergman & Lerner, 2002; Bullock & Cameron, 2001; Fabbrini et al, 2002).
Should antipsychotics be used in dementia?
In addition to general concerns about the saftey of neuroleptics for older people, the use of any medication to treat psychotic symptoms in dementia is increasingly being questioned. Do psychotic symptoms that are not distressing or adversely affecting the patient require treatment with medication (Kidder, 2003)? A careful assessment of potentially remediable environmental causes such as sensory deprivation, poor lighting and social isolation can prevent use of antipsychotics. Addressing other contributory and causal factors such as physical illness and side-effects of medication (Box 6
) is equally important.
| Box 6 Medications that can cause psychotic symptoms in elderly people during use or on withdrawal Benzodiazepines Antihistamines
Anti-Parkinsonian drugs
Anti-arrhythmics
Anti-inflammatory drugs
Anticonvulsants
Steroids
Anti-cancer drugs (Wood et al, 1988; Targum & Abbott, 1999; Targum, 2001)
|
Non-pharmacological treatment of psychotic symptoms in dementia
Non-pharmacological treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms (including psychosis) in dementia has been the subject of increasing research in recent years (Overshott et al, 2004).The non-pharmacological approach requires a detailed knowledge of the patients personality and past psychiatric history, careful listening, observation of the current situation, and effective verbal and non-verbal communication. Cohen-Mansfield (2003) has described a three-stage (Box 7
) approach involving assessment, ascertainment of causes of symptoms and planning an intervention such as the following.
| Box 7 The stages of a non-pharmacological approach to symptoms of dementia (Cohen-Mansfield, 2003) Assessment This includes systematic observation of the patient and should concentrate on the following areas:
Ascertaining possible causes for the symptoms Some symptoms have environmental causes, and important areas to explore are:
Planning an intervention The following points should be kept in mind:
|
Reducing sensory deprivation
Practical measures aimed directly at the patient might include a hearing aid or glasses. External measures such as improving lighting, providing enhanced-contrast materials, and larger type faces and objects may also help. An increase in positive stimulation through auditory sensations such as music and tactile sensations such as touch and massage may also prove useful.
Reducing inappropriate inner sensory stimulation
Simple practical measures can reduce stimulations that produce psychotic symptoms. Examples include removing mirrors if reflections cause the delusion of having phantom boarders in the house, or drawing a curtains over windows if the patient has a delusion of being spied on or followed.
Measures for specific symptoms
Misinterpretation of reality is the basis of a number of psychotic symptoms in dementia. A common symptom such as seeing caregivers as impostors can be addressed by training them to establish a positive relationship with the patient, introduce themselves with each encounter and clearly explain what they are going to do before doing it.
Delusions of infidelity or abandonment in institutionalised patients can be addressed by arranging frequent contact with their families. This can be real or simulated (by using videotapes of family members or simulated presence therapy; Hall & Hare, 1997; Camberg et al, 1999). Measures such as frequent telephone calls and bringing familiar items from the patients home can also be helpful in countering feelings of abandonment and betrayal.
The delusion that other people are stealing belongings can be addressed by providing duplicates of items that are easily mislaid (such as reading glasses), providing a remote control finder or using methods such retrieval, which teaches the patient always to return certain items to particular places (McKitrick et al, 1992).
|
|
|---|
Drugs, however, are not the only option for psychotic symptoms, particularly those that neither distress nor endanger the patient. Much can be achieved with non-pharmacological interventions such as environmental changes, sensitive staff training and a patient-centred approach, which offer a safe augmentation of, or even alternative to, medication for a growing population of vulnerable people.
|
|
|---|
MCQ answers
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
How safe are antipsychotics in dementia? DTB, November 1, 2007; 45(11): 81 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||