APT CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2007) 13: 392-393. doi: 10.1192/apt.13.5.392a
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lanzaro, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lanzaro, M.

In-patient CRHT consultant psychiatrists as ‘osmotic agents’: one year’s experience

Massimo (aka Max) Lanzaro

In-patient/Crisis Home Treatment Team Consultant Psychiatrist, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Wonford House Hospital, Dryden Road, Exeter EX2 5AF, UK. Email: maxlanzaro{at}btinternet.com.

In Devon – a predominantly rural area of the UK covering a large geographical patch with dispersed centres of population – we have noticed some encouraging preliminary results with the intensive crisis resolution/home-treatment team (CRHT) in averting admissions. The in-patient CRHT consultant works as an ‘osmotic agent’.

To explain this metaphor one should consider mental health teams as having ‘semipermeable membranes’, rather than being watertight compartments. Consider an in-patient team and a crisis resolution team as being separated by such a membrane. The pores are large enough to let some particles (i.e. patients) pass freely while the passage of others is inhibited. This two-way process is analogous to the teams’ functions of gatekeeping and promoting early discharge. Within this model, the consultant provides supervision and leadership (a key role in monitoring, allowing and facilitating the osmosis) to both the CRHT and the in-patient team.

With this approach the bed occupancy rate in the Mid Devon County area has dropped by 35% over the past 10 months. We registered a decreased number of involuntary hospital admissions and a lower prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy when compared with previous approaches.

The new approach is substantially in line with the final report New Ways of Working for Psychiatrists, issued in the UK by the National Steering Group, co-chaired by the National Institute for Mental Health in England (NIMHE) and the Royal College of Psychiatrists (Department of Health, 2005).

Our preliminary experience suggests that the new model and the review of the in-patient CRHT consultant’s role might affect positively the utilisation of specialty mental health services, thus achieving a pragmatic balance between community and hospital care.

References

Department of Health (2005) New Ways of Working for Psychiatrists: Enhancing Effective, Person-Centred Services through New Ways of Working in Multidisciplinary and Multi-Agency Contexts. Final Report ’But Not the End of the Story’. Department of Health.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lanzaro, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lanzaro, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals