Anne Lingford-Hughes and John Potokar are senior lecturers at the University of Bristol. Dr Lingford-Hughes is Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist at the Bristol Area Specialist Alcohol Service (Avon and Wiltshire Partnership Mental Health Trust) and Dr Potokar is Honorary Consultant in Liaison Psychiatry at the Bristol Royal Infirmary. Professor David Nutt is currently Professor of Psychopharmacology, Head of the Department of Clinical Medicine and Dean of Clinical Medicine and Dentistry, based at the University of Bristol (Psychopharmacology Unit, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK; tel: 0117 925 3066; fax: 0117 927 7057; e-mail: David.J.Nutt{at}bristol.ac.uk). The Psychopharmacology Unit's research programme includes anxiety disorders, addiction and neuroimaging.
The relationship between anxiety disorders and substance misuse is intimate. Here we concentrate on alcohol, although for completeness we also briefly mention other substances taken for anxiety relief or that cause anxiety.
The term misuse is important and should be qualified. Many people drink alcohol or take illicit drugs without any apparent consequences. Once this use becomes problematic, at any level of consumption, misuse is a more appropriate term.
Recent research exploring the molecular underpinning of anxiety disorders, together with advances in our understanding of how alcohol affects brain neurochemistry, can help to explain this intimate relationship. We review the evidence and how this can provide a framework for both diagnosis and management in a patient with comorbidity. Few studies address the best way of managing patients with dual diagnosis but several drugs are licensed for the treatment of individual anxiety disorders and are likely to be helpful in combination with alcohol treatment strategies.
Until recently, anxiety was used as an umbrella term that spanned the spectrum from normal human emotion to severe pathological states. The 1970s and 1980s heralded the beginning of a more rigorous approach to the discrete constellation of symptoms that make up the individual anxiety disorders. This has not only helped in tailoring therapeutic approaches but has also enabled researchers to explore the pathophysiological foundations of the various disorders. The ICD10 (World Health Organization, 1992) categorises anxiety disorders as phobic (social, simple, agoraphobic), generalised, panic disorder and obsessivecompulsive disorder (OCD). Of these, the last is less robustly associated with substance misuse.
Although pharmacological and psychological treatments for anxiety disorders are effective, the most common response for an individual with anxiety is to use recreational drugs, principally alcohol, to alleviate the symptoms. The widespread availability and relative low cost of alcohol means that although it is widely used as a social lubricant and for its short-term euphoriant effects, it is also frequently used as self-medication for anxiety disorders, low mood and sleep problems. Prospective studies show that alcohol dependence and anxiety disorders demonstrate a reciprocal causal relationship over time, with anxiety disorders leading to alcohol dependence and vice versa (Kushner et al, 1990).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 1 Anxiety as a feature of substance misuse |
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
Fig. 1 Pathway from anxiety to self-medication with alcohol and consequent dependency; , increase; , decrease
|
Alcohol shares many similar pharmacological and behavioural actions with benzodiazepines and barbiturates. These drugs can be prescribed as sedatives, anxiolytics, hypnotics or anticonvulsants. Short-acting benzodiazepines have greater addictive potential than longer-acting formulations. Not surprisingly, anxiety is commonly associated with withdrawal from benzodiazepines. At what dose and after how long a benzodiazepine causes significant withdrawal is difficult to define in routine clinical practice but current British National Formulary (BNF; British Medical Association & Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2001) guidelines suggest prescription only for disabling conditions and for not longer than 4 weeks. However, it is important to note that benzodiazepines are far safer than alcohol and in patients with anxiety disorders long-term use is sometimes indicated where other medications have failed.
|
|
|---|
There have been several community prevalence studies determining the comorbidity of anxiety and alcoholism. People with an anxiety disorder have approximately double the odds of also having a substance misuse disorder (Table 2
). This typically equates to one-quarter to one-third of people with an anxiety disorder, with rates of comorbidity being higher in women. The anxiety disorder generally precedes alcohol or drug problems or dependence. This finding is consistent but not confirmatory of the self-medication hypothesis'. The exception to this is panic disorder, which can emerge from alcohol misuse (Merikangas et al, 1998).
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 2 Odds ratio of an additional diagnosis (alcohol or drug problems or dependence) with any anxiety disorder |
The rates of anxiety disorders in substance misusers are also quite high. In a survey of drug misusers in contact with treatment services, the lifetime prevalence of a phobic disorder was 26% in men and 45% in women (Krausz et al, 1998). For other anxiety disorders the rates were 10% for men and 22% for women. In an out-patient methadone-maintained population, lifetime rates of any anxiety disorder were 6.1% in men and 10.7% in women. The most common disorders seen were simple phobia (females) and panic disorder (males) (Brooner et al, 1997).
Thus, in both substance misuse and anxiety disorder populations, rates of the other disorders are high. When comorbidity occurs it is likely that each disorder will be more difficult to treat and consequently the clinician needs to know not only why this relationship occurs but also how to recognise and manage this comorbidity.
|
|
|---|
The association does not necessarily reflect a direct causal relationship. Instead, the vulnerability to both disorders may arise from another factor, perhaps genetic, familial or biological.
A number of research paradigms have been devised to study the anxiolytic effects of alcohol. Not all studies confirm that alcohol is anxiolytic, and factors such as how anxiety is defined (e.g. as tension, fear, frustration, stress), the amount of alcohol consumed, previous experience, situation and expectations play a role (Kushner et al, 1990). For example, in patients with social anxiety disorder, alcohol itself failed to reduce anxiety associated with public speaking but the belief that they had received alcohol did reduce anxiety (Himle et al, 1999).
From a psychiatric perspective the relationship between alcohol and anxiety disorders cannot be understood without knowledge of the effect of alcohol on brain neurotransmission and the role of neurotransmitters in these disorders. In the past it was thought that anxiety disorders were purely functional, with no real biological basis, and alcohol dependence was often perceived to be the result of constitutional weakness. It is now very clear that neurotransmitter and receptor function are altered in both anxiety disorders and alcohol dependence. Three neurotransmitter systems are likely to be especially important in this relationship: the
-aminobutyric acid (GABA), serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline systems.
|
|
|---|
1 subunit of the GBzR in mice, diazepam is no longer sedative and by altering the
2 subunit, it is no longer anxiolytic (Rudolph et al, 2001). As alcohol is a GBzR agonist, it has been proposed that hypofunction of this system is involved in vulnerability to alcoholism. Although short-term exposure to alcohol increases GABA-ergic function, long-term exposure is associated with reduced GBzR levels and function. It has been proposed that such a reduction is important as an underlying neurobiological mechanism of tolerance. Neuroimaging studies have shown reduced levels of the GBzR in abstinent alcohol-dependent patients, predominantly in the frontal lobes (e.g. Lingford-Hughes et al, 1998).
There is also evidence for altered GABA-ergic function in anxiety disorders. Patients with panic disorder appear to be sub-sensitive to the effects of benzodiazepines (Roy-Byrne et al, 1989), suggesting an alteration in the set-point of the receptor. This, together with the panicogenic effects of the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil, points to altered GABA-ergic function, which may underpin the raised anxiety in these patients. Chronic benzodiazepine use in patients with anxiety disorders is associated with reduced GBzR sensitivity (Potokar et al, 1999) and we have some preliminary evidence that alcohol dependency is associated with grossly reduced GBzR sensitivity. Furthermore, Malizia et al (1998) have shown, using positron emission tomography, that there is a reduction in global GBzR binding in patients with panic disorder compared with matched controls, emphasising the important role of this receptor system in this disorder.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 3 Indications for pharmacotherapy and potential problems of prescribed drugs1 |
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
Fig. 2 Possible routes to alcohol dependence implicating the serotonergic (5-HT) system; , increase; , decrease
|
|
|
|---|
2 agonist, which reduces noradrenergic output from the brainstem. This drug is increasingly used to manage opiate withdrawal, but a recent study has suggested lack of efficacy in patients undergoing in-patient alcohol detoxification (Keaney et al, 2001).
A dysfunctional noradrenergic system is also implicated in anxiety, providing another common biological substrate for both anxiety and substance misuse. Drugs such as amphetamines and cocaine, which increase noradrenaline, are anxiogenic, while the
2 agonist clonidine reduces anxiety and has some activity in reducing spontaneous and lactate-induced panic (Coplan et al, 1992).
In conclusion it is clear that anxiety and alcohol misuse can each give rise to the other, but the relationship is complex. Similarities in the underlying cause of substance misuse and anxiety disorders suggest that a common mechanism may be effective in ameliorating both disorders.
|
|
|---|
There are many reasons why people with anxiety disorders initiate and maintain alcohol misuse and why current management is not optimum. These include the availability of alcohol, failure of patients and doctors to recognise pathological anxiety and uncertainty or lack of knowledge about treatment options. Education of both patients and doctors is obviously critical if some of these factors are to be addressed.
|
|
|---|
Anxiety is a normal human emotion that rises and falls in response to both external and internal cues. Pathological anxiety (anxiety disorder) is characterised by its intensity, duration, autonomy (i.e. it has a life of its own) and functional impairment (often characterised by changes in behaviour).
If an anxiety disorder is suspected, are panic attacks present? Panic attacks are often not identified because the clinician asks only about the recent past, whereas the natural history of panic attacks frequently results in a reduction in their intensity with time. A useful question is to ask whether the patient has ever experienced a sudden surge in anxiety that felt overwhelming and was accompanied by the typical somatic and cognitive symptoms. If a positive answer is elicited, the clinician should ask about the first time that this ever happened this will often be remembered in great detail and may also explain consequent avoidant (agoraphobic) behaviour. If a history of panic attacks is obtained, are these cued (social anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or specific phobia) or spontaneous (panic disorder)?
Every patient who presents with anxiety symptoms should be asked about alcohol intake and, if a history of excessive alcohol use is obtained (hazardous, harmful or dependent), anxiety disorders should be screened for. A useful tool is the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaire, which has been recommended for routine use by the World Health Organization (Saunders et al, 1993).
It is essential to try to establish the sequence of development of clinical problems. Was the anxiety disorder present before the alcohol misuse (e.g. social anxiety disorder, agoraphobia) or secondary to it (e.g. panic disorder, general anxiety disorder)? Psychoeducation is useful. Often patients will never have discussed in detail their anxiety symptoms and may not relate their alcohol problem to anxiety.
Assessment of substance misuse
Clearly, a comprehensive assessment of any patient is critical. Although it is commonly thought that patients do not accurately reveal their true alcohol and drug consumption, this is not necessarily the case nor should it hinder a history being obtained. Evidence can also be obtained from a physical examination: needle or track marks may be indicative of intravenous drug misuse and palmar erythema of alcohol misuse. A urine drug screen will reveal recent drug use; abnormal liver function tests and mean corpuscular volume are generally apparent in alcohol misuse. In patients with anxiety disorder, the amount being consumed is not as relevant as the reliance on the substance.
|
|
|---|
Panic disorder
Pharmacological treatments Results from several studies show that 7080% of patients treated with anti-panic agents show moderate to marked improvement (e.g. Ballenger et al, 1993). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are efficacious; citalopram and paroxetine are licensed. Of the tricyclic antidepressants, clomipramine and imipramine are the most studied and are effective. There is slightly more evidence for clomipramine, which is the more serotonergic of these drugs. Improvement does not depend on affective status. None of the tricyclics are licensed for this indication in the UK. Most studies of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) have been uncontrolled, and although many clinicians view them as effective, they are usually reserved for treatment-resistant patients. Reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors (RIMAs) such as moclobemide have minimal side-effects and probably some efficacy. They are not licensed for use in panic disorder.
Benzodiazepines are efficacious but high doses of standard benzodiazepines or high-potency agents such as clonazepam are needed (presumably because of reduced GBzR sensitivity in these patients). Tolerance to therapeutic effects does not tend to occur. Their fast onset of action makes them ideal for co-prescribing when other agents (e.g. SSRIs) are initiated, thus preventing the initial exacerbation of symptoms that occurs with these agents. Relapse rates are high when they are withdrawn.
Psychological treatments Behavioural (both exposure and relaxation), cognitive and cognitivebehavioural treatments are effective. Psychodynamic therapy has not been evaluated.
Post-traumatic stress disorder
Pharmacological treatments Up to 80% of patients with PTSD have comorbid conditions. Antidepressants have the most evidence supporting use, especially those with serotonergic activity. SSRIs are useful and both paroxetine (UK) and sertraline (US) are licensed. Nefazodone and trazodone, which block 5-HT2 receptors as well as 5-HT reuptake, may be useful especially if there is pronounced sleep disturbance. MAOIs may be useful for treatment-refractory cases. Although there are no controlled studies of benzodiazepines, clonazepam (which has a long duration of action and some serotonergic effects) is sometimes usefully prescribed.
Psychological treatments Cognitivebehavioural strategies (usually employing exposure rather than systematic desensitisation) are effective in reducing symptoms. Several studies have shown eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing to be reasonably effective (Rothbaum, 1997; Carlson et al, 1998), although other studies report more modest effects (Pitman et al, 1996; Devilly & Spence, 1999).
Social anxiety disorder
Pharmacological treatments The SSRIs are efficacious, tolerable and safe and are generally considered first-line treatment. Paroxetine is licensed for treatment of social anxiety disorder. MAOIs are also effective but their relatively poor tolerability and safety means that they are reserved for refractory cases. Early studies (Versiani et al, 1992) suggested considerable efficacy for RIMAs but more recent studies (Schneier et al, 1998) have been equivocal, although moclobemide is licensed.
Two controlled studies of benzodiazepines in social anxiety disorder have been carried out (Davidson et al, 1993). A response rate of 78% was found for clonazepam (v. 20% for placebo). Although well-tolerated, concerns about dependence mean that they are usually reserved for resistant cases.
Beta-blockers are frequently prescribed, especially by general practitioners, but are generally not useful in generalised social anxiety disorder. They are, however, effective in specific performance anxiety.
Psychological treatments Both cognitive therapy and exposure therapy are effective and the combination probably has advantages over each therapy alone.
Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD)
Pharmacological treatments Both trazodone and imipramine have demonstrated efficacy in controlled trials. Of the newer agents, venlafaxine is effective and has recently been licensed for this use. Buspirone is effective and may be especially so when there are prominent psychic symptoms. Benzodiazepines are effective and have rapid onset of action. Although patients with uncomplicated GAD do not tend to run into problems with benzodiazepine use, concerns about dependence limit their prescription.
Psychological treatments Cognitivebehavioural therapies (CBTs) incorporating relaxation training, cognitive therapy and image rehearsal have some efficacy.
Specific phobia
Generally, drug treatments are not useful unless the fear is so great that exposure therapy (the treatment of choice) is not possible.
Obsessivecompulsive disorder
Pharmacological treatments Clomipramine is effective, as are the SSRIs. The relatively benign side-effect profile of the latter means that they are first-line treatments; paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline and fluvoxamine are licensed for this indication.
Psychological treatments Behaviour therapy is superior to both relaxation therapy and placebo. Cognitive therapy (especially CBT) appears to be effective.
Treating anxiety disorders in the presence of substance misuse
Treating comorbid substance misuse and anxiety can be tackled either by concentrating on one of the disorders first (but which one?), or by addressing them together. Psychological approaches are commonly applied to treat both substance misuse and many forms of anxiety, although lack of availability may be a limiting factor. Pharmacotherapy is frequently used to treat anxiety but some form of psychological therapy is also usually required. In treating substance misuse, pharmacotherapy can be used as a substitute, for withdrawal or for maintaining abstinence.
Although both psychological and pharmacological treatments have been shown to be efficacious in treating either anxiety or a substance misuse disorder, there is limited knowledge about treating the comorbid condition (Scott et al, 1998). Most of the literature concerned with treating comorbid anxiety disorder concentrates on alcohol misuse, with little described on drug misuse. Clearly, if alcohol is being used to medicate anxiety symptoms, then relapse after or during alcohol treatment is more likely if the anxiety disorder is not also treated. A pragmatic approach might be to target treatment on the patient's anxiety, even if he or she is still drinking, but in our experience this is more likely to have an impact if drinking is at non-dependent levels.
Abstinence
Abstinence alone may improve anxiety symptoms. Although 40% of in-patients undergoing alcohol withdrawal had significantly elevated anxiety ratings in the first week, in the following week scores returned to normal (Brown et al, 1991). This emphasises the need first to detoxify the patient and then to reassess after 23 weeks of sobriety (see UK Alcohol Forum guidelines at http://www.ukalcoholforum.org). Even if abstinence is not achieved, minimising the contribution of alcohol or other drugs to the mental state is desirable.
Psychological treatment
Psychological strategies dominate treatment of alcohol and substance misuse, often involving group work. Inevitably, those with anxiety disorders, especially social anxiety disorder, find groups hard to attend. Thus, at best these patients may not be able to benefit fully from the treatment offered for alcoholism and at worst the underlying cause of their alcoholism may be untreated. Many alcohol services run anxiety-management groups or tackle a patient's anxiety in individual therapy.
Given that achieving abstinence can be very difficult for patients because it involves removing their anxiolytic, is there any evidence to support concurrent treatment ? A recent study addressed this question: people with alcoholism were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of CBT for their alcohol dependence alone or for alcohol and social anxiety disorder together (Randall et al, 2001). Drinking behaviour and social anxiety improved in both groups, but the group that received treatment for both anxiety and alcohol had poorer outcomes in drinking behaviour. Notably, no correlation was seen between improvement in anxiety and drinking behaviour. The reasons for this result were not clear, but alcohol may have been drunk in order to cope with the treatment programme for anxiety. This study did not explicitly address whether treatment for alcohol misuse or for anxiety should come first. Another study compared out-patient CBT with 12-step facilitation therapy in females with alcoholism and social anxiety disorder. Abstinence was achieved for longer with CBT than with 12-step therapy. However, the reverse was seen in males with the same disorder (Randall et al, 2000). These studies underscore the need for appropriate patient selection for treatment and that there is no universal panacea.
Pharmacological treatment
Almost 30 years ago imipramine was shown to improve panic disorder and drinking behaviour (Quitkin et al 1972), but few studies have been performed. Buspirone, a 5-HT1A partial agonist, has also been shown to improve anxiety (some with GAD) in alcoholism and also to improve drinking behaviour and reduce craving (Kranzler et al, 1994). The impact of SSRIs in treating comorbid alcohol and anxiety is not clear.
When considering the use of SSRIs, it is important to recognise that subgroups of alcoholism do exist, in particular Types 1 and 2 (Cloninger et al, 1981). In treating alcoholism either with or without a comorbid depressive disorder, SSRIs in Type B (akin to Type 2) alcoholism may not only result in no improvement but may actually reduce the impact of psychological treatment such as CBT (Kranzler et al, 1996). Thus, it should be borne in mind that for some people, SSRIs are not the drug of choice.
The use of benzodiazepines in an alcohol-dependent population is controversial (excluding use for alcohol withdrawal) and should not be undertaken without expert advice and monitoring. When abstinent, people with alcohol dependence may be at higher risk of benzodiazepine misuse and dependence because of their greater rewarding effects (Ciraulo & Nace, 2000). Despite the level of concern, there is evidence to suggest that a history of alcohol misuse/dependence does not necessarily result in greater use of benzodiazepines, particularly for those who are less severely dependent. Therefore, their use should not be automatically excluded in the alcohol-misusing patient. Those patients who are severely dependent or with antisocial personality disorder or with polysubstance misuse are most at risk of misusing benzodiazepines. For some people, maintenance benzodiazepines can be indicated to maximise abstinence and minimise morbidity.
Although not specifically investigated in comorbid alcoholism and anxiety disorders, acamprosate may be useful. Most studies show that acamprosate as an adjunct to psychosocial treatment doubles the rate of abstinence, but clearly many patients are not helped. One study has suggested that patients who drink to overcome withdrawal or anxiety derived the greatest benefit (Lesch & Walter, 1996).
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] | MCQ answers |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. B. Crome and T. Myton Pharmacotherapy in dual diagnosis Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2004; 10(6): 413 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||