|
|
|||||||||||
Femi Oyebode is Professor and Head of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Birmingham (Department of Psychiatry, Queen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2QZ, UK).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Autobiographical narratives of mental illness are unique sources of information. They allow psychiatrists and other mental health workers a rare insight into the richness of psychopathology as experienced, rather than as drawn out and described by psychiatrists. Furthermore, the impact of psychiatric illness and the consequences of being labelled on the identity and social life of individuals can be more forcefully described. The variety of folk understanding, what is now technically termed health belief, is also revealed and given validity such that it challenges the perspective of psychiatry. The many rituals of psychiatry, the pernicious and restricting environment of hospitals and the importance of personal relationships with clinicians are all exposed and discussed in autobiographical narratives. It is evident that psychiatrists would benefit from reading autobiographical narratives. It is also an opportunity to become familiar, in a safe and unthreatening manner, with what our patients think of us and the services we provide. Books, at least, can be read in privacy. The emotionally charged views of many of our patients can be confronted without the impulse to become defensive. However, not all autobiographical accounts are critical of psychiatry or psychiatrists. And those that are deserve to be read and understood.
The aim of this paper is to examine the main themes found in autobiographical narratives. For this purpose, I have excluded autobiographical novels such as Janet Frames Faces in the Water(1980). I have also excluded fictional works such as Patrick McGraths Spider(1990) that treat mental illness or asylums as major issues. Journals and poetry have also been excluded. My choice of books is not exhaustive. There is an established tradition of borrowing from autobiographical narratives of mental illness. Jaspers, in his General Psychopathology(1913), borrowed from Schrebers Memoirs of My Nervous Illness(1955). Indeed, Freud (1911) and Sass (1994) have based their own notions of delusions on Schrebers Memoirs. In many respects, all psychiatrists owe a debt to Schreber, whose writing has helped to illuminate psychopathology and shape our understanding of psychotic experiences. This fact further underlines the importance of autobiographical narratives to psychiatry.
| Psychopathology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was the autumn of 1826. I was in a dull state of nerves, such as everybody is occasionally liable to; unsusceptible to enjoyment or pleasurable excitement; one of these moods when what is pleasure at other times, becomes insipid or indifferent... In this frame of mind it occurred to me to put the question directly to myself, "suppose that all your objects in life were realised; that all the changes in institutions and opinions which you are looking forward to, could be completely effected at this very instant: would this be a great joy and happiness to you?" And an irrepressible self-consciousness distinctly answered, "No!" At this my heart sank within me (1989 reprint: p. 112).
Mills intention in his autobiography was not to write about mental illness, thus he did not dwell for long on this aspect of his life. Neither did he understate or minimise his experiences. We are aware of the recurrence, severity and impact of his depressive episodes. We see that he considered suicide, but there is no melodrama in the account. We are left with the impression of an active intelligence, a generous spirit who is totally committed to human progress. His childhood and prodigious talent, his extraordinary erudition and accomplishments put his experience of depression into context.
In contrast to Mills description of loss of enjoyment, we have William Styrons evocation of the anguish of depression: I was feeling in my mind a sensation close to, but indescribably different from actual pain (1990: p. 16). This analogy between depression and physical pain recurs in many writers. Writing in 1902, William James described depression as follows: It is a positive and active anguish, a sort of psychical neuralgia wholly unknown to normal life (1999 reprint: p. 165). For others, the intangibility of the emotional pain drives the individual to inflict actual physical harm that will result in real, that is, physical pain. For example, Sarah Ferguson wrote The pain is so unbearable inside me that a force of such strength has driven me to inflict a physical pain on myself in the hope of appeasing the other (1973: p. 166).
Fiona Shaws description of the effect of depression on how she experienced her body is worthy of note because it touches on an aspect of depression that is not remarked upon in standard textbooks:
My body became inert, heavy and burdensome. Every gesture was hard.
... My existence was pared away almost to nothing, except for the self-contempt that bruised my eye sockets and throat, that turned my stomach and made my tongue into some large, coarse creature in my mouth (Shaw, 1997: p. 26 & p. 27).
The relationship of depression to the loss of faith and hope is ever present in these narratives. There is also the inevitability of suicide. The pervasive, obtrusive and inescapable reality of suicide is under-appreciated by clinicians. Styron described how:
many of the artefacts of my house had become potential devices for my own destruction; the attic rafters (and an outside maple or two) a means to hang myself, the garage a place to inhale carbon monoxide, the bathtub a vessel to receive the flow from my open arteries (p. 52).
Jamison, in her book An Unquiet Mind(1995), described how, once she had decided to end her life, she was cold-bloodedly determined not to give any indication of my plans or the state of my mind (p. 113).
This efficient and detached approach to suicide is echoed in Clifford Beers book, A Mind that Found Itself(1907). Beers, like Styron, described how suicidal thinking compels the individual to consider various methods that may be used. In Beers case, he chose jumping from a height and survived. His deliberate deception of his parents and relatives as to his intentions is instructive to psychiatrists. Once he had decided on a method, he distracted his parents attention from the severity of his condition by behaving as normally as possible. The compulsive nature of suicidal thinking and the tendency to deceive others once the decision to make an attempt has been reached should be more widely understood by all clinicians but perhaps more so by the nurses who have charge of patients on a day-to-day basis.
Jamison described the experience of manic elation very well and also the transition from joyful elation to dysphoric elation:
When youre high its tremendous. The ideas and feelings are fast and frequent like shooting stars and you follow them until you find better and brighter ones. Shyness goes; the right words and gestures are suddenly there, the power to captivate others a felt certainty. There are interests found in uninteresting people. Sensuality is pervasive and desire to seduce and be seduced irresistible... But somewhere this changes... Everything previously moving with the grain is now against you are irritable, angry, frightened, uncontrollable, and enmeshed in the blackest caves of the mind (1995: p. 67).
Psychoses
There is a dearth of good descriptions of psychotic experiences compared with descriptions of mood disturbance. This difference is perhaps understandable given the effects of schizophrenia on motivation, drive and use of language. Schrebers account of his psychoses (1903) and Beers description of his illness (1907) are two outstanding examples of descriptions of psychotic experience. It is not the intention of this paper to discuss the clinical diagnoses of these authors but rather to use their writings to illustrate some aspects of psychotic experience. The interested reader will find much of value in the two books. Both Schreber and Beers described what is a now termed delusional misidentification syndrome. The example below is from Beers book:
I soon jumped to a second conclusion, namely, that this was no brother of mine at all. He instantly appeared in the light of a sinister double, acting as a detective. After that I refused to speak to him again, and this repudiation I extended to all relatives, friends and acquaintances. If as I had accepted my brother was spurious, so was everybody ... For 2 years I was without relatives or friends, in fact, without a world, except that one created by my own mind from the chaos that reigned within it...
Though they all appeared as they used to, I was able to detect some slight difference in look or gesture or in intonation of voice, and this was enough to confirm my belief that they were impersonators, engaged in conspiracy, not merely to entrap me, but to incriminate those whom they impersonated (1907: p. 23 & p. 52).
Schrebers Memoirs(1903) is instructive in many respects. We find a superior intelligence describing and commenting on his experiences. He also analyses psychiatric conceptions of psychopathology, drawing on the literature of his day:
By hallucinations one understands, a far as I know, stimulation of nerves by which a person with a nervous illness believes he has impressions of events in his external world, usually perceived through the sense of seeing or hearing, which in reality do not exist. Science seems to deny any reality background for hallucinations, judging from what I have read for instance in Kraepelins PSYCHIATRY, Vol. 1, p. 102 ff. 6th edition. In my opinion this is definitely erroneous, at least if so generalised (1955 reprint: p. 223).
Schreber described a multitude of hallucinatory and passivity experiences. What is remarkable is the degree to which he retains a self-observant consciousness. He informs us that:
For almost 7 years except during sleep I have never had a single moment in which I did not hear voices. They accompany me to every place and at all times; they continue to sound even when I am in conversation with other people, they persist undeterred even when I concentrate on other things (1955 reprint: p. 225).
His description of passivity experiences is exceptional:
My fingers are paralysed, the direction of my gaze is changed in order to prevent my finding the right keys, my fingers are diverted on to the wrong keys, the tempo is quickened by making the muscles of my fingers move prematurely (1955 reprint: p. 144).
Schrebers Memoirs is likely to continue to be influential. It contains some of the best descriptions of psychotic experience.
| The rituals of psychiatry |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Acting on the order of the doctor in charge, one of them stripped me of my outer garments; and, clad in nothing but underclothes, I was thrust into a cell. Few, if any, prisons in this country contain worse holes than this cell proved to be. It was one of five, situated in a short corridor adjoining the main ward. It was about 6 feet wide by 10 long and of a good height... The walls and floor were bare, and there was no furniture. A patient confined here must lie on the floor (p. 124).
Beers described how the brutalising environ-ment coarsened the sensitivity of newly appointed young attendants such that, soon after being appointed, they became as harsh as the others. Furthermore, he described how the harsh and violent environment made him more hostile and violent. He wrote:
Deprived of my clothes, of sufficient food, of warmth, of all sane companionship and of my liberty, I told those in authority that so long as they should continue to treat me as the vilest of criminals, I should do my best to complete the illusion (p. 146).
He argued that more fundamental than technical reform, cure or prevention was the need for a changed spiritual attitude towards the insane. Beers succeeded in describing the perverse structures and oppressive regime of the early-20th-century American psychiatric system. It is easy to be self-congratulatory, particularly because of the absence of physical restraints and overtly punitive regimes in modern psychiatric hospitals. However, our wards are still permeated and characterised by a lack of respect for patients; a subtly coercive atmosphere still presides. It is true, too, that an unreflective and inhumane indifference to anguish can still be observed. The situation is complicated by a worsening intolerance by the public and undue emphasis by the political class and media on risk rather than care and compassion. Beers, sadly, is still relevant today.
| Relationship with doctors |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One day, after many troubles, you were holding me, and my head was just touching your face, and I became stronger than you, and you became mine ... my head was only just touching your face. We never spoke of it... I tell you, it became easier to be with you then (but not noticeably so), and my trust in you grew, that is all (p. 31).
... If our relationship had been exposed to a crowd, it would have been damaged; not broken, because it was strong and unbreakable... Only under our own terms could it grow. It might have perished under a public glare because it was so real and true. There was no pretence (p. 120).
The book is particularly tragic because we know that in the end the author does not survive; that she kills herself.
The third volume of Janet Frames An Autobiography(1990) is entitled The Envoy from Mirror City and describes her relationship with Dr Cawley at the Maudsley Hospital. The chapter entitled Dr Cawley and the luxury of time describes her introduction to the doctor and explains why she took to him readily. She wrote:
I think I was able to accept Dr Cawley because I was aware that his view was wider, over a range of studies and disciplines and personal experience, just as I had readily accepted Dr Miller because I knew he was interested in music and art. The qualifications of medicine and psychiatry were extensions of these men, not starting and ending points (p. 383).
I now had confidence in Dr Cawley, for I had not only seen myself developing and growing in his care, I had observed his own development as an assured psychiatrist who, I felt, would always respect the human spirit before the practice, the fashions and demands of psychiatry (p. 385).
It is obvious that our patients have views about us, about our personality, our attitudes and approach to psychiatry. It is too easy to forget that, just as we appraise the patient, we too are being appraised, assessed and judged. The therapeutic encounter is two-way.
| Impact of diagnosis and labelling on social life |
|---|
|
|
|---|
I suffered from schizophrenier. It seemed to spell my doom, as if I had emerged from a chrysalis, the natural human state, into another kind of creature (p. 196).
I was taking my new status seriously. If the world of the mad were the world where I now officially belonged (lifelong disease, no cure, no hope), then I would use it to survive, I would excel in it (p. 198).
This new status had social implications:
I was in hiding. I was grieving. I didnt want anyone to "see", for once I had been in hospital, I had found that people didnt only "see", they searched carefully (p. 211).
Frame helps us to see how, once labelled and treated as mentally ill, a person can become other, separated spiritually and socially from family and society. A sense of loneliness, of not belonging and of constantly being under scrutiny ensues and undermines confidence. This can result in the patient readily seeking asylum in the company of people designated as mentally ill, despite the fact that the asylum is neither welcoming nor a healthy refuge. Frame also helps us to see that a self-imposed restraint exists. Lack of confidence, shame and fearfulness combine to entrench a person further in misery.
Seabrook understood the influence of institutionalisation:
No responsibilities, no obligations, no problems to meet or solve, no duties or decisions. We didnt even have to decide when to get up in the morning or when to go to bed. Somebody else looked after us... so that, cured now, outside... I remember the haven it was almost wish sometimes I were back there (1935: p. 68).
| Understandings of emotional disorders |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It doesnt add up, it doesnt cut a swathe that is clear. For if my mother and I were simply ill, am I not wasting everyones time? England, history, family, love, regret, identity, meaning. Does their poetry fall apart under the prose of science? Is it as absurd as looking for the meaning of a headache in history, the meaning of cancer in culture? (p. 196).
Fiona Shaw (1997) expresses the same disquiet but from a different perspective:
There was no scepticism and no psychology. Lives, it seems, can be described as illnesses and organised in just the same way as organic disease would be.
The psychiatrists were never interested in the words I chose. Words had only one side to them, as far as they were concerned; storymaking was all very well so long as it didnt go too far (p. 156 & p. 175).
What do these understandings or readings mean for psychiatrists? Unlike physicians, psychiatrists cannot ignore the social and personal meanings of illness. We cannot be indifferent to the compulsion that patients have for a coherent narrative of causation that moves outside the mechanistic materialism of biochemistry. For most patients, the explanations for their emotional disorder reside within the social world. Psychiatry does not need to adopt or even endorse these particular narrative explanations. However, our professional narratives of causation must at least be open to dialogue and, as individual clinicians, we must understand the motifs that are readily used by our patients.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Books are not necessarily referenced to their first editions. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ferguson, S. (1973) A Guard Within. London: Chatto & Windus.
Frame, J. (1980) Faces in the Water. London: Womens Press.
Frame, J. (1990) An Autobiography. London: Womens Press.
Freud, S. (1911) Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). Reprinted (19531974) in the Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (trans. and ed. J. Strachey), vol. XII. London: Hogarth Press.
James, W. (1902) The Varieties of Religious Experience. Reprinted (1999). New York: The Modern Library.
Jamison, K. R. (1995) An Unquiet Mind. A Memoir of Moods and Madness. New York: Knopf.
Jaspers, K. (1913) General Psychopathology. Reprinted (1962): trans. J. Hoenig & M. W. Hamilton. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lott, T. (1996) The Scent of Dried Roses. London: Penguin.
McGrath, P. (1990) Spider. London: Penguin.
Mill, J. S. (1873) Autobiography. Reprinted (1989): ed. J. M. Robson. London: Penguin.
Sass, L. A. (1994) The Paradoxes of Delusion. Wittgenstein, Schreber and the Schizophrenic Mind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Schreber, D. P. (1903) Memoirs of My Nervous Illness. Reprinted (1955): trans. I. Macalpine & R. A. Hunter. London: Wm. Dawson & Sons.
Seabrook, W. B. (1935) Asylum. London: Harrap.
Shaw, F. (1997) Out of Me. London: Penguin.
Styron, W. (1990) Darkness Visible. A Memoir of Madness. London: Cape.
Wolpert, L. (1999) Malignant Sadness. The Anatomy of Depression. London: Faber & Faber.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Oyebode Fictional narrative and psychiatry Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., March 1, 2004; 10(2): 140 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Vassilas Dementia and literature Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2003; 9(6): 439 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wolpert INVITED COMMENTARY ON: Autobiographical narrative and psychiatry Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., July 1, 2003; 9(4): 270 - 271. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Psychiatric Bulletin | All RCPsych Journals |