APT CPD Online e-learning site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhugra, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bhugra, D.
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2003) 9: 473-474
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Invited commentary on: Globalisation and psychiatry

Dinesh Bhugra

Professor of Mental Health and Cultural Diversity, Health Services Research Department, PO Box 25, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 5AF, UK.

The responses of nations and individuals to globalisation and the effects of the phenomenon on the mental health of the population are many and varied, according to its critics’ perceptions. Kelly (2003, this issue) highlights the greatest criticism of globalisation – the management of cultural diversity. This is related to homogenisation of cultures across the globe and to how that process leads to loss of individual and kinship cultural identities. The act of globalisation is based simply on a capitalist mode of production – moving it around the world to use cheap labour – and on increased access to global media. Both of these influence cultures in the context of industrialisation and urbanisation. Berger (2002) suggests that the dynamics of globalisation are related to diffusion of culture through both elite and popular vehicles: business and the media.

Kelly argues for a return to the biopsychosocial model of psychiatry, and he is right. However, biopsychosocial models never went away – only the biosocial psychiatrists did, in their rush to identify genes leading to schizophrenia or to study brain scans to identify areas that contribute to mental illness. Unfortunately, neither pathway has led to a psychiatric utopia. Today, the social has given way to cultural, spiritual and anthropological aspects of new aetiological models trying to enter the nosology.


    Migration in the era of globalisation
 Top
 Migration in the era...
 Urbanisation and...
 Impact on mental health
 Conclusion
 References
 
Globalisation not only leads to migration of individuals across national boundaries: the borders themselves are ‘disappearing’ because of the internet. Globalisation is seen as the intensification of global interconnectedness (Inda & Rosaldo, 2002). This leads to an itinerant capitalism that demands the cheap production of goods, which in turn results in the industrialisation of nations that have the workforce but not the infrastructure to cope with it. The consequent rural-to-urban migration brings with it a series of problems and expectations. Blue et al(1995) have elegantly demonstrated increased rates of common mental disorders in the urban slums of India, Brazil and Chile. This increase is related to social factors – poor housing and its related infrastructure and economic problems. The loss of social support resulting from migration to urban areas brings its own problems.

There is considerable evidence to suggest that migrants are prone to particular psychiatric illnesses (Bhugra 2001; Bhugra & Jones, 2001). The acculturation due to globalisation may lead to loss of original cultural identity, thereby giving rise to certain psychiatric conditions.

We know that ‘culture shock’ and conflict of cultures also lead to increased psychological morbidity. Kelly places poverty at the top of the list for increase in morbidity, but increasing awareness of discrepancy between what individuals thought that they could achieve as a direct or indirect result of globalisation and what they actually attain is more likely to produce alienation and hopelessness.


    Urbanisation and industrialisation
 Top
 Migration in the era...
 Urbanisation and...
 Impact on mental health
 Conclusion
 References
 
The urbanisation and industrialisation arising from globalisation both lead to a loss of personal identity. The individual and cultural voice of the ‘other’ expected to provide the labour of globalised industry is lost. Gupta & Ferguson (2002) enquire about the identity of the ‘we’ as well as of the ‘other’. A cultural landscape for and of tourists and the presence and worries of the migrants, the refugees, the exiles and the guests affect nation states and the national character.

It is unfortunate that Kelly did not focus more on the impact of political abuse on the migrants forced to flee when the interference of world superpowers allows tyrants take control. The new global cultural economy has to be seen as a complex, overlapping, disjunctive order that can no longer be understood in terms of existing centre–periphery models (Appadurai, 2002), but in the total cultural context. The centralised sources of economic and social power are now giving way to a model in which power and goods move across nation states. The globalisation of culture is not the same as homogenisation.


    Impact on mental health
 Top
 Migration in the era...
 Urbanisation and...
 Impact on mental health
 Conclusion
 References
 
The altering patterns of culture as a consequence of globalisation and media homogenisation have been illustrated by Becker et al(2002), who found that rates of eating disorders in Fiji went up as a result of the introduction of television. To make sense of what Appadurai (2002) calls ethnoscapes, mediascapes, technoscapes, financescapes and ideoscapes, the long-term impact of globalisation on the human psyche must be studied by psychiatrists in conjunction with economists, geographers, anthropologists and sociologists. Appadurai’s ‘scapes’ can be understood at both the individual and the collective level, and the world view of individuals and of groups is likely to change with globalisation. Clinicians must be prepared for this.

Mahadevia (2002) highlights an important factor relating to urbanisation by suggesting that the loss of public space to private owners contributes to urban stress.

Another danger of globalisation worth bearing in mind is the drive to homogenisation that derives from the culture of consumerism (Moreiras, 1998). Clinicians must also be aware of the relocation of languages in cultures as a result of globalisation (Mignolo, 1998). The links between languages and the boundaries of humanity have shaped the ideas of literature, the cultures of scholarship and civilisation itself. The articulation of languages and their cultures have reduced barriers to communication. The growing ‘Anglicisation’ of the world is obvious. It is possible that such globalisation may be causing cultures to become more fundamentalist and restrictive, which might in itself contribute further to stress and psychological morbidity.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Migration in the era...
 Urbanisation and...
 Impact on mental health
 Conclusion
 References
 
Kelly is right to caution us that human rights should be a priority, but as Ghodse (2003, this issue) points out, he is offering a Eurocentric view. The attack on New York’s ‘Twin Towers’ was not a result of globalisation. Kelly also proposes that the loss of social capital resulting from increased globalisation might be inducing a wave of anomie in Western populations. However, he says little regarding the positive implications of globalisation for world mental health. The international action that the World Health Organization recently took to control the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) shows just how globalisation can benefit people. The dissemination of preventive and public health medicine is clearly a positive aspect of globalisation. Nevertheless, the impact of globalisation on individual migrants is likely to be long lasting in both economic and psychological terms.


    References
 Top
 Migration in the era...
 Urbanisation and...
 Impact on mental health
 Conclusion
 References
 
Appadurai, A. (2002) Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. In The Anthropology of Globalization (eds J. X. Inda & R. Rosaldo), pp. 46–63. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Becker, A. E., Burwell, R. A., Gilman, S. E., et al (2002) Eating behaviours and attitudes following prolonged exposure to television among ethnic Fijian adolescent girls. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 509–514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berger, P. (2002) The cultural dynamics of globalization. In Many Globalizations (eds P. Berger & S. P. Huntingdon), pp. 1–16. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bhugra, D. (2001) Migration and schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum, 407, 68–73.

Bhugra, D. & Jones, P. (2001) Migration and mental illness. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 7, 216–222.[Free Full Text]

Blue, I., Ducci, M., Jaswal, S., et al (1995) The mental health of low income nations. In Urbanization and Mental Health in Developing Countries (eds T. Hanpham & I. Blue), pp. 75–102. Aldershot: Avebury.

Ghodse, A. H. (2003) Invited commentary on: Globalisation and psychiatry. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9, 470–473.[Free Full Text]

Gupta, A. & Ferguson, J. (2002) Beyond culture. In The Anthropology of Globalization (eds J. X. Inda & R. Rosaldo), pp. 65–80. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Inda, J. X. & Rosaldo R. (2002) Introduction. The Anthropology of Globalization (eds J. X. Inda & R. Rosaldo), pp. 65–80. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Kelly, B. D. (2003) Globalisation and psychiatry. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9, 464–470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mahadevia, D. (2002) Communal space over life space: saga of increasing vulnerability in Ahmedabad. Economic and Political Weekly, Nov 30.

Mignolo, W. (1998) Globalization, civilization process and the relocation of language and cultures. In The Cultures of Globalization (eds F. Jameson & M. Miyoshi), pp. 32–53. Durham: Duke University Press.

Moreiras, A. (1998) Global fragments. In The Cultures of Globalization (eds F. Jameson & M. Miyoshi), pp. 81–102. Durham: Duke University Press.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Global Social PolicyHome page
V. Bhavsar and D. Bhugra
Globalization: Mental Health and Social Economic Factors
Global Social Policy, December 1, 2008; 8(3): 378 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhugra, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bhugra, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatric Bulletin All RCPsych Journals