Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T06:49:54.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A physical lesson for the clinicians?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Pavan Chahl*
Affiliation:
Hellesdon Hospital Norwich, UK. E-mail: pavandridoc@rediffmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2005 

In 2002, a colleague (P. Jeyapaul) and I conducted an audit on physical examination in psychiatric practice while we were working as senior house officers in a teaching hospital. The standard for the audit was that every patient should have received a basic physical examination within 72 h of admission. Of the 78 patients included in the audit, 17 (22%) received a complete examination and 27 (35%) were not examined at all. Of those who were not examined, 9 did not consent and 2 were agitated; no reason was given for the failure to examine the others. The remaining 34 (43%) received an incomplete examination, the most neglected area being the central nervous system. Out of the 78 patients, the records of only 1 mentioned that the skin was examined for evidence of self-harm and substance misuse.

Reference GardenGarden's (2005) article rightly stresses the need to keep up to date with these basic skills and the different areas of focus in the physical examination and their relevance to psychiatric disorders.

References

Garden, G. (2005) Physical examination in psychiatric practice. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11, 142149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.